• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Multicenter comparison of MicroScan and BACTEC blood culture systems.MicroScan与BACTEC血培养系统的多中心比较。
J Clin Microbiol. 1987 Dec;25(12):2355-8. doi: 10.1128/jcm.25.12.2355-2358.1987.
2
Comparison of the BACTEC MYCO/F Lytic bottle to the isolator tube, BACTEC Plus Aerobic F/bottle, and BACTEC Anaerobic Lytic/10 bottle and comparison of the BACTEC Plus Aerobic F/bottle to the Isolator tube for recovery of bacteria, mycobacteria, and fungi from blood.比较BACTEC MYCO/F溶解瓶与隔离管、BACTEC Plus需氧F/瓶以及BACTEC厌氧溶解/10瓶,以及比较BACTEC Plus需氧F/瓶与隔离管从血液中分离细菌、分枝杆菌和真菌的能力。
J Clin Microbiol. 2001 Dec;39(12):4380-6. doi: 10.1128/JCM.39.12.4380-4386.2001.
3
Controlled comparison of the BACTEC high-blood-volume fungal medium, BACTEC Plus 26 aerobic blood culture bottle, and 10-milliliter isolator blood culture system for detection of fungemia and bacteremia.BACTEC高血容量真菌培养基、BACTEC Plus 26需氧血培养瓶和10毫升隔离器血培养系统检测真菌血症和菌血症的对照比较
J Clin Microbiol. 1993 Apr;31(4):865-71. doi: 10.1128/jcm.31.4.865-871.1993.
4
Multicenter comparison of BACTEC 9050 and BACTEC 9240 blood culture systems.BACTEC 9050和BACTEC 9240血培养系统的多中心比较。
J Clin Microbiol. 1998 Jun;36(6):1601-3. doi: 10.1128/JCM.36.6.1601-1603.1998.
5
Controlled clinical comparison of BacT/ALERT standard aerobic medium with BACTEC standard aerobic medium for culturing blood.BacT/ALERT标准需氧培养基与BACTEC标准需氧培养基用于血液培养的对照临床比较。
J Clin Microbiol. 2003 Jun;41(6):2391-4. doi: 10.1128/JCM.41.6.2391-2394.2003.
6
[Laboratory-based evaluation of significance to routinely use anaerobic blood culture bottles: analysis of positivity and rapidity to detect positive cultures].[基于实验室对常规使用厌氧血培养瓶重要性的评估:阳性培养物检测的阳性率和快速性分析]
Rinsho Byori. 2009 Dec;57(12):1145-50.
7
Lack of requirement for blind subcultures of BACTEC blood culture media.对BACTEC血培养培养基进行盲传代培养的需求缺失。
J Clin Microbiol. 1981 Nov;14(5):567-70. doi: 10.1128/jcm.14.5.567-570.1981.
8
Detection of simulated candidemia by the BACTEC 9240 system with plus aerobic/F and anaerobic/F blood culture bottles.使用BACTEC 9240系统及加氧/F和厌氧/F血培养瓶检测模拟念珠菌血症。
J Clin Microbiol. 2003 Oct;41(10):4714-7. doi: 10.1128/JCM.41.10.4714-4717.2003.
9
Controlled evaluation of the agar-slide and radiometric blood culture systems for the detection of bacteremia and fungemia.琼脂平板和放射性血液培养系统检测菌血症和真菌血症的对照评估
J Clin Microbiol. 1986 Feb;23(2):221-5. doi: 10.1128/jcm.23.2.221-225.1986.
10
Controlled clinical comparison of bioMérieux VITAL and BACTEC NR-660 blood culture systems for detection of bacteremia and fungemia in adults.生物梅里埃VITAL和BACTEC NR - 660血培养系统用于检测成人菌血症和真菌血症的对照临床比较
J Clin Microbiol. 1999 Jun;37(6):1709-13. doi: 10.1128/JCM.37.6.1709-1713.1999.

引用本文的文献

1
Biographical Feature: Franklin P. Koontz, Ph.D., D(ABMM), F(AAM).个人简介:富兰克林·P·孔茨博士,医学微生物学文凭(美国微生物学家委员会颁发),美国微生物学会会员。
J Clin Microbiol. 2020 Feb 24;58(3). doi: 10.1128/JCM.01975-19.
2
Comparison of Difco ESP and Organon Teknika BacT/Alert continuous-monitoring blood culture systems.迪夫科ESP和奥加农·泰尼克BacT/Alert连续监测血培养系统的比较。
J Clin Microbiol. 1994 May;32(5):1273-9. doi: 10.1128/jcm.32.5.1273-1279.1994.
3
Evaluation of BACTEC 9240 blood culture system by using high-volume aerobic resin media.使用大容量需氧树脂培养基对BACTEC 9240血培养系统进行评估。
J Clin Microbiol. 1995 Sep;33(9):2451-3. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.9.2451-2453.1995.
4
Assessment of the BACTEC NR660 blood culture system for the detection of bacteremia in young children.评估BACTEC NR660血培养系统用于检测幼儿菌血症的情况。
J Clin Microbiol. 1989 Apr;27(4):721-3. doi: 10.1128/jcm.27.4.721-723.1989.
5
Detection of bloodstream infections in children.儿童血流感染的检测
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1989 Sep;8(9):815-24. doi: 10.1007/BF02185854.

本文引用的文献

1
Nosocomial septicemia due to multiply antibiotic-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis.多重耐药表皮葡萄球菌所致的医院败血症
Ann Intern Med. 1982 Jan;96(1):1-10. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-96-1-1.
2
Coagulase-negative staphylococcal bacteremia in patients receiving immunosuppressive therapy.接受免疫抑制治疗患者的凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌菌血症
Arch Intern Med. 1983 Jan;143(1):32-6.
3
Hospital-acquired bloodstream infections with Staphylococcus epidermidis. Review of 100 cases.医院获得性表皮葡萄球菌血流感染。100例病例回顾。
Am J Med. 1984 Oct;77(4):639-44. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(84)90354-1.
4
Automated radiometric detection of bacteria in 2,967 blood cultures.2967份血培养物中细菌的自动放射性检测。
Appl Microbiol. 1971 Nov;22(5):846-9. doi: 10.1128/am.22.5.846-849.1971.
5
Comparison of two liquid blood culture media containing sodium polyanethole sulfonate: tryptic soy and Columbia.两种含聚茴香脑磺酸钠的液体血液培养基的比较:胰蛋白酶大豆培养基和哥伦比亚培养基。
Appl Microbiol. 1974 Apr;27(4):699-702. doi: 10.1128/am.27.4.699-702.1974.
6
Evaluation of radiometric system for detecting bacteremia.用于检测菌血症的辐射测量系统的评估
Appl Microbiol. 1973 Sep;26(3):368-72. doi: 10.1128/am.26.3.368-372.1973.
7
Rapid detection of bacteremia by a radiometric system. A clinical evaluation.用放射性测量系统快速检测菌血症。临床评估。
Am J Clin Pathol. 1974 Jun;61(6):859-66. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/61.6.859.
8
Determination of the optimum incubation period of blood culture broths for the detection of clinically significant septicemia.确定用于检测具有临床意义的败血症的血培养肉汤的最佳培养时间。
J Clin Microbiol. 1985 Apr;21(4):481-5. doi: 10.1128/jcm.21.4.481-485.1985.

MicroScan与BACTEC血培养系统的多中心比较。

Multicenter comparison of MicroScan and BACTEC blood culture systems.

作者信息

Wasilauskas B, Gay R, Zwadyk P, Pfaller M, Koontz F

机构信息

Department of Pathology, Bowman Gray School of Medicine, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27103.

出版信息

J Clin Microbiol. 1987 Dec;25(12):2355-8. doi: 10.1128/jcm.25.12.2355-2358.1987.

DOI:10.1128/jcm.25.12.2355-2358.1987
PMID:3323229
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC269487/
Abstract

Recently, MicroScan (Baxter MicroScan Div., W. Sacramento, Calif.) introduced a radiolabeled-blood-culture system that is compatible with the BACTEC 460 (Johnston Laboratories, Inc., Towson, Md.). A multicenter blood culture study was initiated to evaluate this new system. Approximately 20 ml of blood was obtained from each patient and divided equally between BACTEC and MicroScan bottles which were incubated and processed identically. Aerobic bottles were examined twice on days 1 and 2 and once on days 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7. Anaerobic bottles were examined once a day for 7 days. There were 3,451 cultures evaluated, and 414 of these subsequently grew microorganisms. Of these positive cultures, 64 were judged to be contaminated. Of the remaining 350 positive cultures, 253 grew in both systems, 54 grew in BACTEC bottles only, and 43 grew in MicroScan bottles only. The average times to detect positive cultures were 1.8 and 2.1 days by the BACTEC and the MicroScan systems, respectively. No significant difference in the number or kind of organisms recovered or in the detection times for positive cultures was observed between the two blood-culturing systems.

摘要

最近,MicroScan(百特医疗MicroScan分部,加利福尼亚州西萨克拉门托)推出了一种与BACTEC 460(约翰斯顿实验室公司,马里兰州陶森)兼容的放射性标记血培养系统。启动了一项多中心血培养研究以评估这个新系统。从每位患者身上采集约20毫升血液,并在BACTEC瓶和MicroScan瓶之间平均分配,这些瓶子以相同方式进行培养和处理。需氧瓶在第1天和第2天检查两次,在第3、4、5、6和7天检查一次。厌氧瓶连续7天每天检查一次。共评估了3451份培养物,其中414份随后培养出微生物。在这些阳性培养物中,64份被判定为污染。在其余350份阳性培养物中,253份在两个系统中均生长,54份仅在BACTEC瓶中生长,43份仅在MicroScan瓶中生长。BACTEC系统和MicroScan系统检测到阳性培养物的平均时间分别为1.8天和2.1天。在两种血培养系统之间,所回收的微生物数量或种类以及阳性培养物的检测时间均未观察到显著差异。