Magee J T, Randle E A, Gray S J, Jackson S K
Department of Medical Microbiology, University Hospital of Wales, Heath Park, Cardiff, UK.
Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 1993;64(3-4):315-23. doi: 10.1007/BF00873090.
Reference strains (2) and 29 isolates of Aeromonas spp. from clinical material and environmental specimens were characterised in traditional biochemical tests, and in pyrolysis mass spectrometry, which gives data reflecting whole-cell composition. Numerical taxonomic analyses of the data sets were compared with conventional identification at species level, and pathogenic potential, as inferred from the origin of the isolates. Clustering with conventional test reaction patterns showed, for each of the species represented, a clearly defined core group of 'typical' isolates, surrounded by a halo of aberrant strains. One further cluster comprised strains intermediate between A. caviae and A. hydrophila, and one strain was grossly atypical in both analyses. Clustering from pyrolysis data corresponded less well with species identification. Broadly, the biochemical division between core and halo strains was supported in pyrolysis for A. caviae and A. sobria, but the main group of A. hydrophila in pyrolysis comprised strains clustering in the core and halo groups of this species, and three strains intermediate between A. hydrophila and A. caviae in biochemical tests. Two further pyrolysis clusters comprised core and halo strains of A. hydrophila. However, pyrolysis clustering correlated well with inferred pathogenicity, showing four clusters of probable pathogens, six clusters of probable non-pathogens, and one two member cluster of doubtful status. Most strains that clustered in the species haloes, or in species-intermediate groups in biochemical tests, were non-human isolates, or were isolated in the absence of symptomatic infection. The correlation of inferred pathogenicity with biochemical clustering was poorer than that with pyrolysis clustering.
对参考菌株(2株)以及从临床材料和环境标本中分离出的29株气单胞菌进行了传统生化试验和热解质谱分析,热解质谱分析可提供反映全细胞组成的数据。将数据集的数值分类分析结果与物种水平的常规鉴定结果以及根据分离株来源推断的致病潜力进行了比较。根据传统测试反应模式进行聚类分析发现,对于每个所代表的物种,都有一组明确界定的“典型”分离株核心群,其周围环绕着异常菌株。另外还有一组菌株介于豚鼠气单胞菌和嗜水气单胞菌之间,并且有一株菌株在两种分析中均表现出明显的非典型性。热解数据聚类与物种鉴定的对应程度较低。总体而言,豚鼠气单胞菌和温和气单胞菌的核心菌株和晕圈菌株在热解分析中的生化区分得到了支持,但嗜水气单胞菌在热解分析中的主要群体包括该物种核心群和晕圈群中的菌株,以及在生化试验中介于嗜水气单胞菌和豚鼠气单胞菌之间的三株菌株。另外两个热解聚类包括嗜水气单胞菌的核心菌株和晕圈菌株。然而,热解聚类与推断的致病性相关性良好,显示出四组可能的病原体、六组可能的非病原体以及一组状态存疑的双成员聚类。大多数聚集在物种晕圈或生化试验中物种中间组的菌株是非人类分离株,或者是在无症状感染情况下分离得到的。推断的致病性与生化聚类的相关性比与热解聚类的相关性差。