Borobio M V, Conejo M, Ramirez E, Suarez A I, Perea E J
Department of Microbiology, University of Seville.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1994 Jun;38(6):1442-5. doi: 10.1128/AAC.38.6.1442.
The in vitro activities of five new quinolones (clinafloxacin [CI-960 or PD-127391], BAY Y 3118, E-4868, E-5065, and E-5068) against 100 Bacteroides fragilis group bacterial isolates were compared with those of ciprofloxacin, ofloxacin, and sparfloxacin. Overall, E-5068 was the most active in vitro (MIC for 90% of isolates tested [MIC90], 0.25 microgram/ml); this was followed by clinafloxacin and BAY Y 3118 (MIC90, 0.5 microgram/ml). Ciprofloxacin, sparfloxacin, and ofloxacin were the least active (MIC90s, 64, 16, and 16 micrograms/ml, respectively). B. fragilis and Bacteroides caccae were more susceptible than the other members of the B. fragilis group to all of the quinolones tested.
比较了五种新型喹诺酮类药物(克林沙星[CI-960或PD-127391]、BAY Y 3118、E-4868、E-5065和E-5068)对100株脆弱拟杆菌属细菌分离株的体外活性,并与环丙沙星、氧氟沙星和司帕沙星进行了比较。总体而言,E-5068的体外活性最强(90%受试分离株的最低抑菌浓度[MIC90]为0.25微克/毫升);其次是克林沙星和BAY Y 3118(MIC90为0.5微克/毫升)。环丙沙星、司帕沙星和氧氟沙星的活性最低(MIC90分别为64、16和16微克/毫升)。脆弱拟杆菌和粪拟杆菌比脆弱拟杆菌属的其他成员对所有测试的喹诺酮类药物更敏感。