Nikoletti S
School of Nursing, Edith Cowan University, Churchlands, Western Australia.
Epidemiol Infect. 1994 Feb;112(1):161-70. doi: 10.1017/s0950268800057526.
Large-scale surveys of immunity to vaccine-preventable diseases may be limited by the inconvenience and expense involved in collection of blood by venepuncture. An alternative method of collecting blood on filter paper for measurement of immunity to diphtheria and tetanus is described. The precut filter disks (Elisadiscs), originally developed for serological diagnosis of disease in pigs, have advantages over previously described methods in that they allow safe handling of minimal volumes of blood (5 microliters) which can be conveniently quantified. To compare values obtained by venepuncture and fingerprick, paired samples were collected from 60 subjects and diphtheria and tetanus antitoxin concentrations were measured by ELISA. There was no significant difference detected between samples collected by the two methods. The results suggest that Elisadiscs are a reliable alternative to venepuncture for monitoring immunity to diphtheria and tetanus and would be useful for sample collection in remote areas and from children.
对疫苗可预防疾病免疫力的大规模调查可能会受到静脉穿刺采血带来的不便和费用的限制。本文描述了一种在滤纸上采集血液以测量对白喉和破伤风免疫力的替代方法。预切割滤纸片(Elisadiscs)最初是为猪疾病的血清学诊断而开发的,与先前描述的方法相比具有优势,因为它们允许安全处理最少体积的血液(5微升),且能方便地进行定量。为了比较静脉穿刺和手指采血所获得的值,从60名受试者中采集了配对样本,并通过酶联免疫吸附测定法(ELISA)测量白喉和破伤风抗毒素浓度。两种方法采集的样本之间未检测到显著差异。结果表明,Elisadiscs是用于监测对白喉和破伤风免疫力的静脉穿刺的可靠替代方法,对偏远地区和儿童的样本采集很有用。