Suppr超能文献

测量生理盐水及其他溶液中的二氧化碳分压:两台血气分析仪的偏差与精密度量化

Measuring carbon dioxide tension in saline and alternative solutions: quantification of bias and precision in two blood gas analyzers.

作者信息

Riddington D, Venkatesh B, Clutton-Brock T, Bion J

机构信息

Department of Anaesthetics and Intensive Care, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK.

出版信息

Crit Care Med. 1994 Jan;22(1):96-100. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199401000-00019.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To quantify the precision and bias for two standard blood gas analyzers when measuring PCO2 in five different test solutions (blood, normal saline, human albumin solution, succinylated gelatin 4%, and Hartmann's solution).

DESIGN

A comparative laboratory study of two blood gas analyzers measuring known PCO2 in test solutions prepared with a thin film tonometer.

MEASUREMENTS

The PCO2 was determined simultaneously in both blood gas analyzers. The precision and bias for both machines were calculated from the measured PCO2.

RESULTS

Analyzer 1 showed a negative bias of between 66.4% and 39.2% when measuring PCO2 in saline. Under the same conditions, analyzer 2 showed a negative bias of between 17.7% and 17.9% for PCO2 in the mid- and high ranges of PCO2, but a positive bias in the low range. Both machines measured PCO2 with satisfactory bias and precision in blood. The use of succinylated gelatin 4% as a test solution improved the bias and precision of both machines.

CONCLUSIONS

Because of the large bias and precision, neither of these machines is suitable for measuring PCO2 in saline solution. The use of succinylated gelatin 4% as a test solution improves the bias and precision of both machines and we favor this solution for nasogastric tonometry. Even with succinylated gelatin 4%, there is a large negative bias with analyzer 1 and our preference is to use analyzer 2. We recommend that other workers review critically the performance of blood gas electrode systems when measuring PCO2 in saline solution. Because of varying performance of "standard" machines, we also recommend that each institution determine its own reference range for intramucosal pH.

摘要

目的

量化两种标准血气分析仪在五种不同测试溶液(血液、生理盐水、人白蛋白溶液、4%琥珀酰明胶和哈特曼溶液)中测量二氧化碳分压(PCO₂)时的精密度和偏差。

设计

一项比较实验室研究,使用两种血气分析仪测量用薄膜式压力计制备的测试溶液中的已知PCO₂。

测量

在两台血气分析仪中同时测定PCO₂。根据测得的PCO₂计算两台仪器的精密度和偏差。

结果

分析仪1在测量生理盐水中的PCO₂时显示出66.4%至39.2%的负偏差。在相同条件下,分析仪2在PCO₂的中高范围内测量PCO₂时显示出17.7%至17.9%的负偏差,但在低范围内显示出正偏差。两台仪器在血液中测量PCO₂时的偏差和精密度均令人满意。使用4%琥珀酰明胶作为测试溶液可提高两台仪器的偏差和精密度。

结论

由于偏差和精密度较大,这两台仪器均不适用于测量生理盐水中的PCO₂。使用4%琥珀酰明胶作为测试溶液可提高两台仪器的偏差和精密度,我们倾向于将这种溶液用于鼻胃管张力测定。即使使用4%琥珀酰明胶,分析仪1仍存在较大的负偏差,我们更倾向于使用分析仪2。我们建议其他研究人员在测量生理盐水中的PCO₂时,严格审查血气电极系统的性能。由于“标准”仪器的性能各不相同,我们还建议每个机构确定自己的黏膜内pH参考范围。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验