• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

百特微生物自动鉴定药敏分析系统酵母鉴定板与Vitek酵母生化鉴定卡的临床比较

Clinical comparison of the Baxter MicroScan Yeast Identification Panel and the Vitek Yeast Biochemical Card.

作者信息

Riddle D L, Giger O, Miller L, Hall G S, Woods G L

机构信息

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.

出版信息

Am J Clin Pathol. 1994 Apr;101(4):438-42. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/101.4.438.

DOI:10.1093/ajcp/101.4.438
PMID:8160633
Abstract

To determine the reliability of the Baxter MicroScan Yeast Identification Panel, processed by the Walkaway-96, and the Vitek Yeast Biochemical Card, 150 clinical yeast isolates (30 Candida albicans, 67 Candida species, not albicans, 26 Torulopsis glabrata, 13 Cryptococcus neoformans, 4 Saccharomyces cerevisiae, 6 Trichosporon beigelii, 3 Rhodotorula species, and 1 Geotrichum species) were tested on both systems. Results were compared with those obtained by the API 20C and the appearance of yeast cells on cornmeal Tween-80 agar. After inoculation of each system, results were available in 4 hours with MicroScan panels, 24-48 hours with Vitek cards, and 72 hours with the API 20C strips. On initial testing, 101 (67%) and 128 (85%) isolates, respectively, were correctly identified by MicroScan and Vitek. After repeat testing, the number of correctly identified isolates increased to 123 (82%) by MicroScan and to 142 (95%) by Vitek. Yeasts most commonly misidentified were Candida tropicalis, T glabrata, and Candida parapsilosis by MicroScan and C tropicalis and T glabrata by Vitek.

摘要

为了确定由Walkaway - 96处理的百特微生物自动鉴定仪酵母鉴定板以及Vitek酵母生化鉴定卡的可靠性,我们使用这两种系统对150株临床酵母分离株(30株白色念珠菌、67株非白色念珠菌属念珠菌、26株光滑假丝酵母菌、13株新生隐球菌、4株酿酒酵母、6株白吉利丝孢酵母、3株红酵母属菌株以及1株地丝菌属菌株)进行了检测。将结果与通过API 20C以及玉米粉吐温80琼脂上酵母细胞的形态所获得的结果进行比较。在接种每种系统后,使用微生物自动鉴定仪鉴定板4小时可获得结果,使用Vitek鉴定卡24 - 48小时可获得结果,使用API 20C鉴定条72小时可获得结果。在初次检测时,微生物自动鉴定仪和Vitek分别正确鉴定了101株(67%)和128株(85%)分离株。经过重复检测后,微生物自动鉴定仪正确鉴定的分离株数量增至123株(82%),Vitek增至142株(95%)。微生物自动鉴定仪最常误鉴定的酵母是热带念珠菌、光滑假丝酵母菌和近平滑念珠菌,Vitek最常误鉴定的是热带念珠菌和光滑假丝酵母菌。

相似文献

1
Clinical comparison of the Baxter MicroScan Yeast Identification Panel and the Vitek Yeast Biochemical Card.百特微生物自动鉴定药敏分析系统酵母鉴定板与Vitek酵母生化鉴定卡的临床比较
Am J Clin Pathol. 1994 Apr;101(4):438-42. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/101.4.438.
2
Comparison of updated Vitek Yeast Biochemical Card and API 20C yeast identification systems.新型Vitek酵母生化鉴定卡与API 20C酵母鉴定系统的比较
J Clin Microbiol. 1994 May;32(5):1184-7. doi: 10.1128/jcm.32.5.1184-1187.1994.
3
Misidentification of clinical yeast isolates by using the updated Vitek Yeast Biochemical Card.使用更新后的Vitek酵母生化鉴定卡对临床酵母分离株进行错误鉴定。
J Clin Microbiol. 1994 Dec;32(12):2889-92. doi: 10.1128/jcm.32.12.2889-2892.1994.
4
[Evaluation of common commercial systems for the identification of yeast isolates in microbiology laboratories: a multicenter study].[微生物实验室中用于鉴定酵母分离株的常见商业系统评估:一项多中心研究]
Mikrobiyol Bul. 2015 Apr;49(2):210-20. doi: 10.5578/mb.9370.
5
Evaluation of the MicroScan Rapid Yeast Identification panel.MicroScan快速酵母鉴定板的评估
J Clin Microbiol. 1991 Oct;29(10):2296-9. doi: 10.1128/jcm.29.10.2296-2299.1991.
6
Evaluation of the updated Vitek yeast identification data base.更新后的Vitek酵母鉴定数据库评估。
J Clin Microbiol. 1990 Sep;28(9):1938-41. doi: 10.1128/jcm.28.9.1938-1941.1990.
7
Comparison of three commercial systems for identification of yeasts commonly isolated in the clinical microbiology laboratory.三种用于鉴定临床微生物实验室中常见分离酵母的商业系统的比较。
J Clin Microbiol. 1999 Jun;37(6):1967-70. doi: 10.1128/JCM.37.6.1967-1970.1999.
8
Evaluation of the Baxter-MicroScan 4-hour enzyme-based yeast identification system.百特-微扫描4小时酶法酵母鉴定系统的评估
J Clin Microbiol. 1991 Apr;29(4):718-22. doi: 10.1128/jcm.29.4.718-722.1991.
9
A comparison of methods for yeast identification including CHROMagar Candida, Vitek system YBC and a traditional biochemical method.酵母鉴定方法的比较,包括显色念珠菌琼脂培养基、Vitek系统YBC和传统生化方法。
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi (Taipei). 2001 Oct;64(10):568-74.
10
Comparison of the Quantum II, API Yeast Ident, and AutoMicrobic systems for identification of clinical yeast isolates.Quantum II、API酵母鉴定系统和自动微生物鉴定系统用于临床酵母分离株鉴定的比较。
J Clin Microbiol. 1988 Oct;26(10):2054-8. doi: 10.1128/jcm.26.10.2054-2058.1988.

引用本文的文献

1
Experience with the MicroSeq D2 large-subunit ribosomal DNA sequencing kit for identification of commonly encountered, clinically important yeast species.使用MicroSeq D2大亚基核糖体DNA测序试剂盒鉴定常见临床重要酵母菌种的经验。
J Clin Microbiol. 2003 Nov;41(11):5099-102. doi: 10.1128/JCM.41.11.5099-5102.2003.
2
Ability of RapID Yeast Plus System to identify 304 clinically significant yeasts within 5 hours.RapID Yeast Plus系统在5小时内鉴定304种临床重要酵母菌的能力。
J Clin Microbiol. 1996 May;34(5):1069-71. doi: 10.1128/jcm.34.5.1069-1071.1996.
3
Genotypic analysis of pseudoepidemic due to contamination of Hanks' balanced salt solution with Candida parapsilosis.
近平滑念珠菌污染汉克斯平衡盐溶液导致假流行的基因分型分析
J Clin Microbiol. 1995 Aug;33(8):2224-6. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.8.2224-2226.1995.