Devlin R B
Health Effects Research Laboratory, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711.
Environ Health Perspect. 1993 Dec;101 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):225-30. doi: 10.1289/ehp.93101s4225.
A number of epidemiological studies have attempted to assess the effect of recurrent ozone exposure in humans. For the most part, they have failed to document convincingly an association between chronic ozone exposure and differences in lung function performance or respiratory symptoms. This is not surprising given the small respiratory effects observed in animals chronically exposed to ozone and assuming that people with abnormal respiratory function resulting from other occupational or environmental exposures, such as tobacco smoke, would make up a much larger percentage of the population than people with respiratory effects attributable to ozone. Therefore, either more sensitive end points must be developed to detect subtle changes due to chronic ozone exposure, or ways of selecting subpopulations that are especially sensitive to ozone must be devised. It has been well documented that there are large and reproducible differences in the acute response of individuals to ozone as measured by pulmonary function tests. Recently, it has also been shown that there are large differences in the acute response of individuals to ozone as measured by inflammatory and other biochemical parameters. This paper discusses the problems of selecting individuals who are sensitive to ozone depending on the end point chosen. It also describes potential new sensitive end points that might be available for ozone epidemiology studies in the near future.
许多流行病学研究试图评估人类反复接触臭氧的影响。在很大程度上,这些研究未能令人信服地证明长期接触臭氧与肺功能表现或呼吸道症状差异之间存在关联。考虑到长期接触臭氧的动物呼吸道效应微小,并且假设因其他职业或环境暴露(如烟草烟雾)导致呼吸功能异常的人群在总人口中所占比例远高于因臭氧导致呼吸道效应的人群,出现这种情况并不奇怪。因此,要么必须开发更敏感的终点指标以检测长期接触臭氧引起的细微变化,要么必须设计出选择对臭氧特别敏感的亚人群的方法。有充分记录表明,通过肺功能测试衡量个体对臭氧的急性反应存在巨大且可重复的差异。最近还表明,通过炎症和其他生化参数衡量个体对臭氧的急性反应也存在很大差异。本文讨论了根据所选终点指标选择对臭氧敏感个体的问题。它还描述了在不久的将来可能用于臭氧流行病学研究的潜在新敏感终点指标。