Kohno S, Yasuoka A, Koga H, Kaku M, Maesaki S, Tanaka K, Mitsutake K, Matsuda H, Hara K
Second Department of Internal Medicine, Nagasaki University School of Medicine, Japan.
Mycopathologia. 1993 Aug;123(2):75-9. doi: 10.1007/BF01365083.
Two different kits for the detection of serum cryptococcal antigen in patients with pulmonary cryptococcosis were evaluated. The Eiken test (the Eiken Co., Tokyo), which uses pronase for pretreatment of serum, was compared with the Crypto-LA test (International Biological Laboratories, Cranbury, NJ), which did not use pronase prior to testing. Cryptococcal antigen was detected in 21 of 23 patients (91%) with the Eiken test and in only 10 of 23 patients (43%) with the Crypto-LA test (p < 0.01 by McNemar test). However, the sensitivity of two tests was identical without use of pronase, as both tests could detect as little as 10(4) cells/ml of Cryptococcus neoformans and 10 ng/ml of capsular polysaccharide of C. neoformans. In those serum specimens for which both tests were positive, titers were much higher for the Eiken test, but there was a statistically significant correlation between the two tests (coefficient correlation 0.79, p < 0.01). Cryptococcal antigen titer levels measured by the Eiken test correlated well with clinical courses. There was one false-positive reaction among 82 sera of non-cryptococcal patients. Pronase enhanced the sensitivity of the Eiken test, which appeared to be useful in patients with pulmonary cryptococcal disease, and its use may prevent unneeded lung biopsies.
对两种用于检测肺隐球菌病患者血清隐球菌抗原的试剂盒进行了评估。使用链霉蛋白酶对血清进行预处理的荣研检测法(日本东京荣研公司),与检测前不使用链霉蛋白酶的隐球菌乳胶凝集试验(美国新泽西州克兰伯里国际生物实验室)进行了比较。荣研检测法在23例患者中的21例(91%)检测到隐球菌抗原,而隐球菌乳胶凝集试验仅在23例患者中的10例(43%)检测到隐球菌抗原(McNemar检验,p<0.01)。然而,在不使用链霉蛋白酶的情况下,两种检测方法的灵敏度相同,因为两种检测方法都能检测到低至10⁴个/ml的新型隐球菌和10 ng/ml的新型隐球菌荚膜多糖。在两种检测均为阳性的血清标本中,荣研检测法的滴度要高得多,但两种检测方法之间存在统计学显著相关性(相关系数0.79,p<0.01)。荣研检测法测得的隐球菌抗原滴度水平与临床病程密切相关。在82份非隐球菌病患者的血清中有1例假阳性反应。链霉蛋白酶提高了荣研检测法的灵敏度,这似乎对肺隐球菌病患者有用,使用该方法可能避免不必要的肺活检。