Cressa C, Zuiani C, Bregant P, Vidimari R, de Guarrini F
Instituto di Radiologia, Università di Trieste.
Radiol Med. 1993 Dec;86(6):893-8.
Recently, 20 breast centers in Friuli Venezia Giulia have been investigated for the mammography optimization program known as DQM (Dose and Quality in Mammography). This was the second trial, the first one dating 1987-1988 and including only 10 centers. The chosen parameters were evaluated by means of a performance phantom containing 15 details, a Victoreen 660 ionizing camera, a star pattern and several plexiglass phantoms of different thickness. Statistical-methodological data were collected by means of a questionnaire. The results of the trial were communicated to each center as well as directions for future improvements. All centers were found to use mammographic equipment with a molybdenum anode and the film-screen combination; 18 center use grids daily, while 11 can perform direct radiographic magnification. Only 40% of the examined centers use a dedicated daylight printer. The overall quality of the radiographic image was seen to be acceptable, as 8 or more details of 15 hidden in the phantom were visualized, in 16 of 20 centers. The mean glandular dose was below the minimum threshold in all centers: in 45% of cases it was below 1.5 mGy. The setting of the automatic exposition control system was found to be poor, especially that of the adjustment related to breast thickness. Acceptability thresholds were met only by 31% of the examined centers (density variations < 20%). Notwithstanding the identification of areas where improvements can be made also from a methodological point of view, we can conclude that the quality provided by regional breast centers is definitely adequate. Good image quality and acceptable doses were observed in 80% of the centers. The results are significant and encouraging when compared with those from the first DQM trial carried out in our region, which confirms the value of periodical quality programs.
