Siegel D P
Miami Valley Laboratories, Procter & Gamble Company, Cincinnati, Ohio 45239-8707.
Biophys J. 1993 Nov;65(5):2124-40. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(93)81256-6.
To understand the mechanism of membrane fusion, we have to infer the sequence of structural transformations that occurs during the process. Here, it is shown how one can estimate the lipid composition-dependent free energies of intermediate structures of different geometries. One can then infer which fusion mechanism is the best explanation of observed behavior in different systems by selecting the mechanism that requires the least energy. The treatment involves no adjustable parameters. It includes contributions to the intermediate energy resulting from the presence of hydrophobic interstices within structures formed between apposed bilayers. Results of these calculations show that a modified form of the stalk mechanism proposed by others is a likely fusion mechanism in a wide range of lipid compositions, but a mechanism based on inverted micellar intermediates (IMIs) is not. This should be true even in the vicinity of the lamellar/inverted hexagonal phase transition, where IMI formation would be most facile. Another prediction of the calculations is that traces of apolar lipids (e.g., long-chain alkanes) in membranes should have a substantial influence on fusion rates in general. The same theoretical methods can be used to generate and refine mechanisms for protein-mediated fusion.
为了理解膜融合的机制,我们必须推断该过程中发生的结构转变顺序。在此,展示了如何估算不同几何形状中间结构的脂质组成依赖性自由能。然后,通过选择能量需求最少的机制,人们可以推断哪种融合机制最能解释在不同系统中观察到的行为。该处理过程不涉及可调参数。它包括由于在相对双层之间形成的结构中存在疏水间隙而对中间能量产生的贡献。这些计算结果表明,其他人提出的茎状机制的一种改进形式在广泛的脂质组成范围内可能是一种融合机制,但基于反胶束中间体(IMIs)的机制则不是。即使在层状/反相六方相转变附近,IMIs形成最容易的地方,情况也应该如此。计算的另一个预测是,膜中痕量的非极性脂质(例如长链烷烃)通常应该对融合速率有重大影响。相同的理论方法可用于生成和完善蛋白质介导的融合机制。