Suppr超能文献

通过一种简单的实验室程序评估10种沙眼衣原体诊断检测方法的敏感性。

Evaluation of sensitivity of 10 diagnostic assays for Chlamydia trachomatis by use of a simple laboratory procedure.

作者信息

Thomas B J, MacLeod E J, Taylor-Robinson D

机构信息

Division of Sexually Transmitted Diseases, Clinical Research Centre, Harrow, Middlesex.

出版信息

J Clin Pathol. 1993 May;46(5):408-10. doi: 10.1136/jcp.46.5.408.

Abstract

AIMS

To determine the sensitivity of commercially available diagnostic assays for Chlamydia trachomatis using a simple method.

METHODS

Nine commercial assays and an "in-house" polymerase chain reaction (PCR) were evaluated using serial dilutions of a laboratory grown H serovar--four of them using a laboratory grown E serovar. Seven of the assays were further tested using dilutions of several cervical samples known to contain chlamydiae.

RESULTS

The most sensitive assays were the MicroTrak direct fluorescent antibody (DFA) test (Syva) and the PCR which detected C trachomatis at a 10(-8) dilution of the H serovar, while the two least sensitive, Clearview (Unipath) and TestPack (Abbott), were positive only at 10(-4) and-3 dilutions, respectively. A range of enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) and a nucleic acid hybridisation test were of intermediate sensitivity. The results with serovar E were consistent with these. When clinical samples were examined, the DFA test detected C trachomatis in dilutions at least 10-fold greater than any other assay.

CONCLUSIONS

The range of sensitivity of diagnostic assays determined by the laboratory dilution procedure is very wide. Sensitivity assessed in this way, however, reflects the ability of the assays to detect C trachomatis in large scale clinical trials. The dilution procedure, which is simple to undertake, could therefore be applied by any laboratory before a new diagnostic method is considered for routine use.

摘要

目的

采用一种简单方法确定市售沙眼衣原体诊断检测方法的敏感性。

方法

使用实验室培养的H血清型的系列稀释液对9种市售检测方法和一种“内部”聚合酶链反应(PCR)进行评估,其中4种检测方法使用实验室培养的E血清型。使用已知含有衣原体的几种宫颈样本的稀释液对其中7种检测方法进行进一步测试。

结果

最敏感的检测方法是MicroTrak直接荧光抗体(DFA)检测法(Syva公司)和PCR,它们在H血清型稀释至10^(-8)时仍能检测到沙眼衣原体,而最不敏感的两种检测方法,Clearview(Unipath公司)和TestPack(雅培公司),分别仅在10^(-4)和10^(-3)稀释度时呈阳性。一系列酶免疫测定(EIA)和一种核酸杂交检测法的敏感性处于中等水平。血清型E的检测结果与这些一致。在检测临床样本时,DFA检测法能检测到稀释度至少比其他任何检测方法高10倍的沙眼衣原体。

结论

通过实验室稀释程序确定的诊断检测方法的敏感性范围非常宽。然而,以这种方式评估的敏感性反映了这些检测方法在大规模临床试验中检测沙眼衣原体的能力。因此,这种简单易行的稀释程序可被任何实验室在考虑将新的诊断方法用于常规使用之前应用。

相似文献

4
Comparative evaluation of detection assays for Chlamydia trachomatis.沙眼衣原体检测方法的比较评估
J Clin Microbiol. 1993 Jun;31(6):1663-6. doi: 10.1128/jcm.31.6.1663-1666.1993.

引用本文的文献

6
STD/HIV control in Malawi.马拉维的性传播感染/艾滋病防控
Genitourin Med. 1995 Jun;71(3):202. doi: 10.1136/sti.71.3.202.

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验