Suppr超能文献

沙眼衣原体检测方法的比较评估

Comparative evaluation of detection assays for Chlamydia trachomatis.

作者信息

Warren R, Dwyer B, Plackett M, Pettit K, Rizvi N, Baker A M

机构信息

Victorian Infectious Diseases Reference Laboratory, Fairfield Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.

出版信息

J Clin Microbiol. 1993 Jun;31(6):1663-6. doi: 10.1128/jcm.31.6.1663-1666.1993.

Abstract

The performances of a commercial nucleic acid hybridization test (Gen-Probe Pace 2 Chlamydia trachomatis) and two commercial enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) (Abbott Chlamydiazyme and Pharmacia Chlamydia EIA) were evaluated against cell culture for the detection of C. trachomatis infection, with cervical swabs obtained from 1,037 women visiting a public sexual health center. The positivity rate by cell culture was 4.7%. Sensitivity and specificity for each test were as follows: Gen-Probe, 95.8 and 98.3%; Chlamydiazyme, 80.4 and 99.3%; Pharmacia EIA, 80.8 and 99.1%. Analysis of discrepant results with probe confirmation assay (Gen-Probe) and direct immunofluorescence (Syva Microtrak) revealed 12 cases of C. trachomatis infection for which culture was negative, resulting in the definition of a true-positive case as opposed to a culture positive. The positivity rate by true-positive definition was 5.9%, and sensitivity and specificity for each test were as follows: Gen-Probe, 96.7 and 99.6%; Chlamydiazyme, 77.5 and 100%; Pharmacia EIA, 77.0 and 100%; cell culture, 80.0 and 100%. We conclude that the Gen-Probe Pace 2 C. trachomatis test is a sensitive and specific alternative to cell culture for the detection of C. trachomatis.

摘要

针对从一家公共性健康中心就诊的1037名女性获取的宫颈拭子,评估了一种商业核酸杂交检测(Gen-Probe Pace 2沙眼衣原体检测)和两种商业酶免疫测定法(EIAs)(雅培衣原体酶免疫测定法和法玛西亚衣原体酶免疫测定法)检测沙眼衣原体感染的性能,并与细胞培养法进行了对比。细胞培养法的阳性率为4.7%。每种检测方法的敏感性和特异性如下:Gen-Probe检测为95.8%和98.3%;衣原体酶免疫测定法为80.4%和99.3%;法玛西亚酶免疫测定法为80.8%和99.1%。通过探针确认试验(Gen-Probe)和直接免疫荧光法(Syva Microtrak)对不一致结果进行分析后发现,有12例沙眼衣原体感染病例,细胞培养结果为阴性,由此确定了与培养阳性相对的真阳性病例定义。根据真阳性定义的阳性率为5.9%,每种检测方法的敏感性和特异性如下:Gen-Probe检测为96.7%和99.6%;衣原体酶免疫测定法为77.5%和100%;法玛西亚酶免疫测定法为77.0%和100%;细胞培养法为80.0%和100%。我们得出结论,对于沙眼衣原体检测,Gen-Probe Pace 2沙眼衣原体检测是一种敏感且特异的细胞培养替代方法。

相似文献

1
Comparative evaluation of detection assays for Chlamydia trachomatis.沙眼衣原体检测方法的比较评估
J Clin Microbiol. 1993 Jun;31(6):1663-6. doi: 10.1128/jcm.31.6.1663-1666.1993.
10
Comparison of a DNA probe with culture for detecting Chlamydia trachomatis directly from genital specimens.
Mol Cell Probes. 1990 Feb;4(1):25-31. doi: 10.1016/0890-8508(90)90036-y.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验