• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

控制他人。权力对刻板印象的影响。

Controlling other people. The impact of power on stereotyping.

作者信息

Fiske S T

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Massachusetts, Amherst 01003.

出版信息

Am Psychol. 1993 Jun;48(6):621-8. doi: 10.1037//0003-066x.48.6.621.

DOI:10.1037//0003-066x.48.6.621
PMID:8328729
Abstract

This article presents a theory of the mutually reinforcing interaction between power and stereotyping, mediated by attention. The powerless attend to the powerful who control their outcomes, in an effort to enhance prediction and control, so forming complex, potentially nonstereotypic impressions. The powerful pay less attention, so are more vulnerable to stereotyping. The powerful (a) need not attend to the other to control their own outcomes, (b) cannot attend because they tend to be attentionally overloaded, and (c) if they have high need for dominance, may not want to attend. Stereotyping and power are mutually reinforcing because stereotyping itself exerts control, maintaining and justifying the status quo. Two legal cases and a body of research illustrate the theory and suggest organizational change strategies.

摘要

本文提出了一种由注意力介导的权力与刻板印象之间相互强化作用的理论。无权者关注控制其结果的有权者,以增强预测和控制能力,从而形成复杂的、可能非刻板的印象。有权者关注较少,因此更容易受到刻板印象的影响。有权者:(a) 无需关注他人就能控制自己的结果;(b) 由于注意力往往过度负荷而无法关注;(c) 如果他们有较高的支配需求,可能不想关注。刻板印象和权力相互强化,因为刻板印象本身就能施加控制,维持并证明现状的合理性。两个法律案例及一系列研究对该理论进行了阐释,并提出了组织变革策略。

相似文献

1
Controlling other people. The impact of power on stereotyping.控制他人。权力对刻板印象的影响。
Am Psychol. 1993 Jun;48(6):621-8. doi: 10.1037//0003-066x.48.6.621.
2
Higher social power increases occupational gender stereotyping in Chinese culture.在中华文化中,较高的社会权力会加剧职业性别刻板印象。
Cogn Process. 2019 Aug;20(3):339-347. doi: 10.1007/s10339-018-0899-9. Epub 2019 Jan 2.
3
Sexual harassment at work: issues and answers for health care administrators.工作场所的性骚扰:医疗保健管理人员的问题与解答
Hosp Health Serv Adm. 1993 Summer;38(2):167-80.
4
Sex-based harassment in employment: new insights into gender and context.就业中的性别骚扰:关于性别与环境的新见解。
Law Hum Behav. 2014 Feb;38(1):58-72. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000045. Epub 2013 Aug 5.
5
Power in stereotypically masculine domains: a Social Influence Strategy X Stereotype Match model.刻板男性化领域中的权力:一种社会影响策略X刻板印象匹配模型
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003 Dec;85(6):1062-78. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.85.6.1062.
6
Interpersonal mistreatment in the workplace: the interface and impact of general incivility and sexual harassment.职场中的人际虐待:一般无礼行为与性骚扰的交集及影响。
J Appl Psychol. 2005 May;90(3):483-96. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.90.3.483.
7
Gender influence on perceptions of hostile environment sexual harassment.性别对敌意环境性骚扰认知的影响。
Psychol Rep. 1995 Aug;77(1):79-82. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1995.77.1.79.
8
Sexual assault in the military.军队中的性侵犯
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2015 Jul;17(7):54. doi: 10.1007/s11920-015-0596-7.
9
Emotional and psychological consequences of sexual harassment: a descriptive study.性骚扰的情感和心理后果:一项描述性研究。
J Psychol. 1996 Jul;130(4):429-46. doi: 10.1080/00223980.1996.9915030.
10
Sexual harassment under social identity threat: the computer harassment paradigm.社会身份威胁下的性骚扰:计算机骚扰范式
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003 Nov;85(5):853-70. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.85.5.853.

引用本文的文献

1
Entrusted power enhances psychological other-orientation and altruistic behavioural tendencies.被赋予的权力会增强心理上的他人导向和利他行为倾向。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2025 Apr;64(2):e12857. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12857.
2
The role of perspective-taking in attenuating self-group distancing in women managers.观点采择在减轻女性管理者自我群体疏离方面的作用。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2025 Apr;64(2):e12812. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12812. Epub 2024 Oct 28.
3
Myths of trauma memory: on the oversimplification of effects of attention narrowing under stress.
创伤记忆的迷思:论压力下注意力狭窄效应的过度简化
Front Psychol. 2024 Jul 22;15:1294730. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1294730. eCollection 2024.
4
The nature of status: Navigating the varied approaches to conceptualizing and measuring status.地位的本质:探索概念化和衡量地位的多样方法。
Organ Psychol Rev. 2024 May;14(2):204-237. doi: 10.1177/20413866231220505. Epub 2023 Dec 19.
5
Social influence and external feedback control in humans.人类的社会影响与外部反馈控制
F1000Res. 2024 Feb 16;12:438. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.133295.3. eCollection 2023.
6
Expanding Nature's storytelling: extended reality and debiasing strategies for an eco-agency.拓展自然叙事:生态能动性的扩展现实与去偏策略
Front Psychol. 2023 Aug 31;14:941373. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.941373. eCollection 2023.
7
Does having more power make people more materialistic? The role of personal sense of power for gift preferences.拥有更多权力会让人更物质主义吗?个人权力感对礼物偏好的影响。
Front Psychol. 2023 Aug 25;14:1235527. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1235527. eCollection 2023.
8
On power and its corrupting effects: the effects of power on human behavior and the limits of accountability systems.论权力及其腐败影响:权力对人类行为的影响以及问责制度的局限性。
Commun Integr Biol. 2023 Aug 24;16(1):2246793. doi: 10.1080/19420889.2023.2246793. eCollection 2023.
9
Field evidence for two paths to cross-cultural competence: implications for cultural dynamics.跨文化能力的两条途径的实地证据:对文化动态的影响
Evol Hum Sci. 2020 Feb 7;2:e3. doi: 10.1017/ehs.2020.1. eCollection 2020.
10
The Sociocognitive Origins of Personal Mastery.个人掌握的社会认知起源。
J Health Soc Behav. 2023 Sep;64(3):452-468. doi: 10.1177/00221465231167558. Epub 2023 May 2.