Druetta A, Freydiere A, Guinet R, Gille Y
Laboratoire de Microbiologie, Hopital de l'Antiquaille, Institut Pasteur de Lyon, France.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1993 May;12(5):336-42. doi: 10.1007/BF01964429.
Five commercial antifungal susceptibility testing systems were studied for repeatability and reproducibility as well as concordance of results with the MICs for ten reference strains belonging to six different species. Repeatability was determined by testing each strain in triplicate on the same day, and reproducibility by repeating this triple determination on three different days. On the basis of 630 yeast-antifungal agent results for Mycototal and Mycostandard, 540 for Candifast, and 450 for ATB Fungus and Diff Test, repeatability was consistently equal to or greater than 95%. Reproducibility was 80.07% for Candifast and greater than 95% for the other systems. The concordance with the reference MICs was 51.65% for Candifast, 75.33% for ATB Fungus, 80.89% for Diff Test, 90.16% for Mycostandard and 90.32% for Mycototal. Although the performance of Diff Test and ATB Fungus was satisfactory, Mycototal and Mycostandard gave notably better results with imidazoles. Mycostandard, which is easier to use and includes tests for fluconazole and itraconazole, would seem to be potentially the most useful antifungal susceptibility test available at present.
对五种商用抗真菌药敏试验系统进行了研究,以评估其重复性、再现性以及与六种不同菌种的十种参考菌株的最低抑菌浓度(MIC)结果的一致性。重复性通过在同一天对每个菌株进行三次测试来确定,再现性则通过在三个不同日期重复这一三重测定来确定。基于Mycototal和Mycostandard的630个酵母-抗真菌剂结果、Candifast的540个结果以及ATB Fungus和Diff Test的450个结果,重复性始终等于或大于95%。Candifast的再现性为80.07%,其他系统的再现性大于95%。与参考MIC的一致性,Candifast为51.65%,ATB Fungus为75.33%,Diff Test为80.89%,Mycostandard为90.16%,Mycototal为90.32%。尽管Diff Test和ATB Fungus的性能令人满意,但Mycototal和Mycostandard在咪唑类药物测试中给出了明显更好的结果。Mycostandard使用更简便,且包括氟康唑和伊曲康唑测试,似乎可能是目前最有用的抗真菌药敏试验。