Miles D A, Bricker S L, Razmus T F, Potter R H
Department of Dental Diagnostic Sciences, Indiana University School of Dentistry, Indianapolis.
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1993 Mar;75(3):397-402. doi: 10.1016/0030-4220(93)90158-z.
This study compared the efficacy of pain control of two medications, used to treat recurrent aphthous stomatitis, placed under a physical barrier of cyanoacrylate. Thirty patients with recurrent aphthous stomatitis were selected from the records of the Diagnostic Referral Clinic at Indiana University School of Dentistry and randomly divided into three groups; one group was a control. Experimental groups received a topical application of either triamcinolone acetonide (0.025%) or chlorhexidine digluconate (0.12%). Medications were covered by isobutyl cyanoacrylate (Iso-Dent). Controls received the Iso-Dent only. Patients kept a diary to record their pain level on a 10 cm visual analog scale until the lesion healed. Ulcer episodes were treated for 12 weeks. Because some patients had multiple episodes, a total of 35 ulcer episodes were available for analysis. The mean number of ulcer days for each group was not significantly different. ANOVA with repeated measures for 10 days on each patient was first performed. A highly significant difference in pain intensity and perception was found at different days (p < 0.0001). No significant difference was found between the triamcinolone acetonide and chlorhexidine gluconate (p < 0.49).
本研究比较了两种用于治疗复发性阿弗他口炎的药物在氰基丙烯酸酯物理屏障下的疼痛控制效果。从印第安纳大学牙科学院诊断转诊诊所的记录中选取了30例复发性阿弗他口炎患者,并随机分为三组;一组为对照组。实验组分别局部应用曲安奈德(0.025%)或葡萄糖酸洗必泰(0.12%)。药物用异丁基氰基丙烯酸酯(Iso-Dent)覆盖。对照组仅接受Iso-Dent。患者记录日记,用10厘米视觉模拟量表记录疼痛程度,直至病变愈合。溃疡发作治疗12周。由于一些患者有多次发作,共有35次溃疡发作可供分析。每组溃疡天数的平均值无显著差异。首先对每位患者进行了为期10天的重复测量方差分析。在不同天数发现疼痛强度和感知存在高度显著差异(p<0.0001)。曲安奈德和葡萄糖酸洗必泰之间未发现显著差异(p<0.49)。