Bovenzi M, Griffin M J, Ruffell C M
Institute of Occupational Health, University of Trieste, Centro Tumori, Italy.
Occup Environ Med. 1995 Dec;52(12):834-41. doi: 10.1136/oem.52.12.834.
To investigate the local and central pathophysiological mechanisms involved in the acute effects of unilateral vibration on the digital circulation of healthy men.
Finger blood flow (FBF) and finger skin temperature (FST) in thermoneutral conditions, and the percentage change in finger systolic pressure (FSP%) after local cooling from 30 to 10 degrees C were measured in the fingers of both hands in eight men (aged 23-47 years) who were not occupationally exposed to hand transmitted vibration. The right hand was exposed for 30 minutes to sinusoidal vibration with a frequency of 125 Hz and an acceleration of 87.5 m.s-2 rms (root mean square). A control condition consisted of exposure to static load only (10 N) without vibration. The measures of digital circulation were taken before exposure to vibration and static load and at 0, 30, 60, and 90 minutes after the end of each exposure.
Exposure to static load caused no significant changes in FBF, FST, or FSP% in either the test right or the control left finger. Immediately after vibration exposure, there was a temporary increase in FBF in the vibrated right finger, whereas the non-vibrated left finger showed no vasodilation. In both the vibrated and non-vibrated fingers, FBF and FST were significantly reduced during the recovery time. A large variability between subjects was found for FBF and, to a lesser extent, for FST. In the vibrated right hand the decrease in FBF was significantly related to cold induced vaso-constriction in the digital vessels. Such a relation was not found in the non-vibrated left hand.
The results of this investigation suggest that acute vibration can disturb the function of digital vessels through two different and opposite mechanisms. Vibration seems to produce local vasodilation and to trigger a central sympathetic reflex vasoconstriction that can be recorded in the ipsilateral and the contralateral finger to vibration. Both local and central vasoconstrictor mechanisms are likely to be involved in the responsiveness to cold found in the digital vessels of a vibrated finger.
研究单侧振动对健康男性手指循环急性影响所涉及的局部和中枢病理生理机制。
在8名(年龄23 - 47岁)未从事手部传递振动职业的男性双手手指中,测量热中性条件下的手指血流量(FBF)和手指皮肤温度(FST),以及从30℃局部冷却至10℃后手指收缩压变化百分比(FSP%)。右手暴露于频率为125Hz、加速度为87.5m·s⁻²均方根(rms)的正弦振动30分钟。对照条件为仅暴露于无振动的静态负荷(10N)。在暴露于振动和静态负荷之前以及每次暴露结束后的0、30、60和90分钟测量手指循环指标。
暴露于静态负荷后,测试的右手手指和对照的左手手指的FBF、FST或FSP%均无显著变化。振动暴露后立即出现,振动的右手手指的FBF暂时增加,而未振动的左手手指未出现血管舒张。在恢复期间,振动和未振动的手指的FBF和FST均显著降低。发现FBF在受试者之间存在很大差异,FST的差异程度较小。在振动的右手中,FBF的降低与手指血管中冷诱导的血管收缩显著相关。在未振动的左手中未发现这种关系。
本研究结果表明,急性振动可通过两种不同且相反的机制干扰手指血管功能。振动似乎会产生局部血管舒张,并引发中枢交感神经反射性血管收缩,这可在振动同侧和对侧手指中记录到。局部和中枢血管收缩机制可能都参与了振动手指的手指血管对寒冷的反应。