Korting H C, Schäfer-Korting M, Klövekorn W, Klövekorn G, Martin C, Laux P
Dermatologische Klinik und Poliklinik, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, Germany.
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1995;48(6):461-5. doi: 10.1007/BF00194335.
In a double-blind, randomized, paired trial lasting 14 days in 72 patients with moderately severe atopic eczema, hamamelis distillate cream (5.35 g hamamelis distillate with 0.64 mg ketone/100 g) was compared with the corresponding drug-free vehicle and 0.5% hydrocortisone cream, and reductions of the basic criteria of severe atopic eczema (delta values of the sum scores), i.e. itching, erythema and scaling, were evaluated. Thirty-six patients in each group were treated, which allowed the detection of a 10% difference between verum and control (confirmatory study). Effects were compared using Wilcoxon's test. The mean sum scores of the basic criteria of the test areas were 5.3-5.5. All treatment regimens significantly reduced itching, erythema and scaling after 1 week. Hydrocortisone proved superior to hamamelis distillate. The basic criteria scores decreased by 2.7 and 1.6, respectively. The delta values of the minor criteria and the global rating of efficacy were also used to indicate the difference between these preparations. Hamamelis distillate cream, however, did not differ from the vehicle. Mean delta values of basic criteria were 1.8 and 2.0, respectively. All preparations were well tolerated. Unwanted cutaneous reactions occurred in six patients, although due to their inflammatory nature and their confinement to vehicle-treated patients, they may not represent true adverse effects but rather a lack of efficacy. The results prove the superiority of low-dose hydrocortisone cream over hamamelis distillate cream, and the therapeutic outcome following this preparation was no better than following the base preparation. The mild, yet unmistakable anti-inflammatory effect of hamamelis cream in experimental models of inflammatory skin disease was thus not reflected by an efficacy in patients with atopic eczema greater than that obtained from the base preparation.
在一项针对72例中度严重特应性皮炎患者的为期14天的双盲、随机、配对试验中,将北美金缕梅馏出物乳膏(5.35克北美金缕梅馏出物与0.64毫克酮/100克)与相应的不含药物的赋形剂以及0.5%氢化可的松乳膏进行比较,并评估了重度特应性皮炎基本标准(总分的差值)的降低情况,即瘙痒、红斑和脱屑。每组36例患者接受治疗,这使得能够检测出试验组与对照组之间10%的差异(验证性研究)。使用威尔科克森检验比较效果。测试区域基本标准的平均总分是5.3 - 5.5。所有治疗方案在1周后均显著减轻了瘙痒、红斑和脱屑。氢化可的松被证明优于北美金缕梅馏出物。基本标准评分分别下降了2.7和1.6。次要标准的差值和总体疗效评分也用于表明这些制剂之间的差异。然而,北美金缕梅馏出物乳膏与赋形剂并无差异。基本标准的平均差值分别为1.8和2.0。所有制剂耐受性良好。6例患者出现了不良皮肤反应,不过由于其炎症性质且仅局限于接受赋形剂治疗的患者,它们可能并非真正的不良反应,而更可能是缺乏疗效。结果证明低剂量氢化可的松乳膏优于北美金缕梅馏出物乳膏,且该制剂的治疗效果并不比基础制剂更好。因此,北美金缕梅乳膏在炎症性皮肤病实验模型中轻微但明确的抗炎作用,在特应性皮炎患者中并未体现出比基础制剂更有效的疗效。