Dresser R
School of Law, case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.
JAMA. 1996 Jul 3;276(1):67-72.
Mentally disabled adults often serve as subjects in research on mental illness, developmental disabilities, dementia, and other conditions associated with mental impairment. Since US regulatory policy fails to resolve many ethical issues presented by such research, investigators and institutional review boards must determine the appropriate standards and procedures for studies involving adults with mental disabilities. Procedures for capacity assessment and information disclosure should enhance the autonomy of capable subjects and accurately identify subjects incapable of independent choice. Research teams should inform proxy decision makers of their ethical responsibities. Decisionally incapable adults objecting to research involvement should rarely be included in studies. Researchers, institutional review boards, advocacy groups, and federal officials should collaborate to improve evaluation of risks and potential benefits to decisionally incapable subjects. These groups should also seek consensus on appropriate risk limits in studies presenting no prospect of direct benefit to decisionally incapable subjects. Finally, subject populations should be represented in research planning and review activities.
智障成年人常被用作精神疾病、发育障碍、痴呆症以及其他与精神损伤相关病症研究的对象。由于美国监管政策未能解决此类研究提出的许多伦理问题,研究人员和机构审查委员会必须确定涉及智障成年人研究的适当标准和程序。能力评估和信息披露程序应增强有行为能力受试者的自主性,并准确识别无独立选择能力的受试者。研究团队应告知代理决策者他们的伦理责任。极少应将反对参与研究的无行为能力成年人纳入研究。研究人员、机构审查委员会、倡导团体和联邦官员应合作,以改进对无行为能力受试者的风险和潜在益处的评估。这些团体还应就对无行为能力受试者无直接受益前景的研究中适当的风险限制达成共识。最后,应让受试者群体参与研究规划和审查活动。