Suppr超能文献

患者自控口服吗啡镇痛

Patient controlled oral analgesia with morphine.

作者信息

Striebel H W, Römer M, Kopf A, Schwagmeier R

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Benjamin Franklin Medical Center, Free University of Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

Can J Anaesth. 1996 Jul;43(7):749-53. doi: 10.1007/BF03017961.

Abstract

PURPOSE

When using strong oral opioids for postoperative pain management, demand titration is desirable. A device for patient controlled oral analgesia (PCORA) and first results of its use for oral titration of morphine are presented.

METHODS

The PCORA-device is a modified Baxter-PCA-on-demand system (maximum bolus volume: 0.5 ml; flow rate for filling bolus volume: 0.5 ml.hr-1). The demand PCORA-volumes were measured at specific time intervals and PCORA was compared with customarily prescribed pain therapy (CPPT) for postoperative pain management. On the first postoperative day, 20 orthopaedic ASA I or II patients received, in a randomised, cross-over trial, either PCORA (300 min) followed by CPPT (300 min) (Group I) or vice versa (Group II). The PCORA-device permitted a maximum dose of 15 mg morphine per 60 min and CPPT was performed by the ward doctor or nurse. Pain intensity (101-point numerical rating scale) and side effects were evaluated at 30 min intervals.

RESULTS

The accuracy of the bolus volume delivered by the PCORA-device was 89.2 +/- 0.85% (mean +/- SEM), of manufacturer's specifications. PCORA pain intensity decreased over time whereas CPPT pain intensity did not (P < 0.001). PCORA-morphine requirements were 61.5 +/- 5.2 mg (Group I) and 52.5 +/- 8.5 mg (Group II) (NS; mean +/- SEM). The handling of the PCORA-device presented no problem to any patient.

CONCLUSION

Patient controlled oral analgesia is an effective and non-invasive mode of postoperative pain management. The PCORA-device is reliable and easy to use.

摘要

目的

在使用强效口服阿片类药物进行术后疼痛管理时,按需滴定是可取的。本文介绍了一种患者自控口服镇痛(PCORA)装置及其用于吗啡口服滴定的初步结果。

方法

PCORA装置是一种改良的百特按需PCA系统(最大推注量:0.5毫升;填充推注量的流速:0.5毫升·小时-1)。在特定时间间隔测量PCORA的需求量,并将PCORA与术后疼痛管理的常规处方疼痛治疗(CPPT)进行比较。在术后第一天,20名骨科ASA I或II级患者在一项随机交叉试验中,接受PCORA(300分钟),然后是CPPT(300分钟)(第一组),或反之(第二组)。PCORA装置允许每60分钟最大剂量为15毫克吗啡,CPPT由病房医生或护士进行。每隔30分钟评估疼痛强度(101点数字评分量表)和副作用。

结果

PCORA装置输送的推注量的准确性为制造商规格的89.2±0.85%(平均值±标准误)。PCORA的疼痛强度随时间降低,而CPPT的疼痛强度没有降低(P<0.001)。PCORA所需吗啡量在第一组为61.5±5.2毫克,在第二组为52.5±8.5毫克(无显著性差异;平均值±标准误)。对任何患者来说,操作PCORA装置都没有问题。

结论

患者自控口服镇痛是一种有效的术后疼痛管理非侵入性模式。PCORA装置可靠且易于使用。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验