Suppr超能文献

患者自控鼻内镇痛(PCINA)用于术后疼痛管理:一项试点研究。

Patient-controlled intranasal analgesia (PCINA) for the management of postoperative pain: a pilot study.

作者信息

Striebel H W, Olmann T, Spies C, Brummer G

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Operative Intensive Care Medicine, Steglitz Medical Center, Free University of Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

J Clin Anesth. 1996 Feb;8(1):4-8. doi: 10.1016/0952-8180(95)00167-0.

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To compare patient-controlled intranasal analgesia (PCINA) for post-operative pain management with ward-provided pain therapy.

DESIGN

Randomized, prospective pilot study.

SETTING

University medical center.

PATIENTS

20 ASA status I and II orthopedic patients.

INTERVENTIONS

On the first postoperative day, 20 patients were randomized to receive either PCINA for 4 hours followed by 5 hours of ward-provided pain therapy (Group 1; n = 10) or ward-provided pain therapy for 5 hours followed by 4 hours of PCINA (Group 2; n = 10). The PCINA device used permits self-administration up to a maximum 0.025 mg dose of fentanyl every 6 minutes. Pain intensity (101-point numerical rating scale) and vital signs, as well as possible side effects, were registered at 30-minute intervals.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Within 30 minutes after the start of PCINA, pain intensity had decreased significantly in both groups. At the 60, 150, 210, 240, 270, 390, 420, and 480 minute measuring points, there was a significant intergroup difference in pain intensity, the level being significantly lower in the PCINA period. The handling of the PCINA device presented no problem to any patient. The PCINA fentanyl requirement was 0.415 +/- 0.083 mg (Group 1) and 0.408 +/- 0.06 mg (Group 2), respectively (NS). The ward-provided pain therapy included pethidine, tramadol, metamizole, acetaminophen, codeine, and diclofenac alone or in combination. Patient satisfaction was greater with PCINA than with ward-provided pain therapy (p < 0.0005).

CONCLUSIONS

PCINA provides an adequate, noninvasive mode of postoperative pain management. The PCINA device is easy to handle and offers new perspectives in the management of postoperative pain.

摘要

研究目的

比较患者自控鼻内镇痛(PCINA)与病房提供的疼痛治疗用于术后疼痛管理的效果。

设计

随机、前瞻性试点研究。

地点

大学医学中心。

患者

20例美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)分级为I级和II级的骨科患者。

干预措施

术后第一天,20例患者被随机分为两组,一组先接受4小时的PCINA治疗,随后接受5小时的病房提供的疼痛治疗(第1组;n = 10);另一组先接受5小时的病房提供的疼痛治疗,随后接受4小时的PCINA治疗(第2组;n = 10)。所使用的PCINA装置允许患者每6分钟自行给药,最大剂量为0.025毫克芬太尼。每隔30分钟记录疼痛强度(101点数字评分量表)、生命体征以及可能的副作用。

测量指标及主要结果

在PCINA开始后的30分钟内,两组患者的疼痛强度均显著降低。在第60、150、210、240、270、390、420和480分钟测量点,两组间疼痛强度存在显著差异,PCINA治疗期间的疼痛水平显著更低。没有患者在使用PCINA装置时遇到问题。第1组和第2组PCINA所需芬太尼剂量分别为0.415±0.083毫克和0.408±0.06毫克(无显著差异)。病房提供的疼痛治疗包括单独或联合使用哌替啶、曲马多、安乃近、对乙酰氨基酚、可待因和双氯芬酸。患者对PCINA的满意度高于病房提供的疼痛治疗(p < 0.0005)。

结论

PCINA提供了一种充分、无创的术后疼痛管理模式。PCINA装置易于操作,为术后疼痛管理提供了新的视角。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验