Clarridge J E, Raich T J, Sjösted A, Sandström G, Darouiche R O, Shawar R M, Georghiou P R, Osting C, Vo L
Laboratory and Medical Service Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
J Clin Microbiol. 1996 Aug;34(8):1995-2000. doi: 10.1128/jcm.34.8.1995-2000.1996.
We have isolated two phenotypically distinct nonfastidious Francisella strains (Fx1 and Fx2) from the blood of compromised patients with pneumonia and compared them with eight other Francisella strains, including Francisella tularensis biovar tularensis, F. tularensis biovar novicida, and F. philomiragia. Our isolates grew well on sheep blood agar, chocolate agar, modified Thayer-Martin agar, and Trypticase soy agar. Fx1 and Fx2 were determined to be within the Francisella genus by cellular fatty acid analysis and by the utilization of glucose, production of H2S and catalase, and lack of motility, oxidase, nitrate reductase, and gelatinase. They were additionally shown to belong to the species F. tularensis by sequencing of two variable regions comprising approximately 500 nucleotides of the 16S rRNA gene. Also, RNA probe hybridization confirmed their belonging to the species F. tularensis. However, the new strains, which are not identical, are distinguished from other F. tularensis strains by growth characteristics, repetitive extragenic palindromic PCR fragment pattern, and some biochemical tests. Key biochemical differences included the findings that Fx1 was positive for beta-galactosidase and arabinose hydrolysis and that both strains were citrulline ureidase positive and glycerol negative. Commercial F. tularensis antiserum agglutinated stock F. tularensis strains but not Fx1, Fx2, F. tularensis biovar novicida, or F. philomiragia; serum from either patient failed to agglutinate or only weakly agglutinated commercial antigen but showed agglutination when tested against each patient's respective isolate. Fx1 and Fx2 produced beta-lactamase. Because of their good growth, negative serology, and biochemical profile, the organisms could be misidentified in the clinical laboratory if standard strategies or commercial identification systems are used.
我们从患有肺炎的免疫功能低下患者的血液中分离出了两株表型不同的非苛养弗朗西斯菌菌株(Fx1和Fx2),并将它们与其他8株弗朗西斯菌菌株进行了比较,包括土拉弗朗西斯菌土拉生物变种、土拉弗朗西斯菌新凶手生物变种和嗜肺弗朗西斯菌。我们分离出的菌株在绵羊血琼脂、巧克力琼脂、改良的Thayer-Martin琼脂和胰蛋白酶大豆琼脂上生长良好。通过细胞脂肪酸分析、葡萄糖利用情况、H2S产生和过氧化氢酶检测以及缺乏运动性、氧化酶、硝酸盐还原酶和明胶酶,确定Fx1和Fx2属于弗朗西斯菌属。通过对16S rRNA基因中两个约500个核苷酸的可变区域进行测序,进一步表明它们属于土拉弗朗西斯菌物种。此外,RNA探针杂交也证实它们属于土拉弗朗西斯菌物种。然而,这两株新菌株并不相同,它们在生长特性、重复外显子回文PCR片段模式和一些生化试验方面与其他土拉弗朗西斯菌菌株有所区别。关键的生化差异包括:Fx1的β-半乳糖苷酶和阿拉伯糖水解试验呈阳性,且两株菌株的瓜氨酸尿素酶试验均为阳性,甘油试验均为阴性。市售的土拉弗朗西斯菌抗血清能凝集标准土拉弗朗西斯菌菌株,但不能凝集Fx1、Fx2、土拉弗朗西斯菌新凶手生物变种或嗜肺弗朗西斯菌;两名患者的血清均不能凝集市售抗原或仅能微弱凝集市售抗原,但在检测各自患者的分离菌株时出现凝集。Fx1和Fx2产生β-内酰胺酶。由于它们生长良好、血清学阴性以及生化特征,如果使用标准策略或商业鉴定系统,这些菌株在临床实验室中可能会被误认。