Suppr超能文献

患者问卷、病历及录音带在全科医疗咨询中健康促进评估方面的比较

Comparison of patient questionnaire, medical record, and audio tape in assessment of health promotion in general practice consultations.

作者信息

Wilson A, McDonald P

机构信息

Department of General Practice, University of Leicester, Leicester General Hospital.

出版信息

BMJ. 1994 Dec 3;309(6967):1483-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.309.6967.1483.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine what proportion of health promotion activities reported by the patient is recorded in the general practice notes and to compare these methods of assessing health promotion with audio tape analysis.

DESIGN

Secondary analysis of data obtained in a controlled trial of differing appointment lengths. After each consultation the medical record was examined and the patient invited to completed a questionnaire. A subsample of consultations was audio taped.

SETTING

Nottinghamshire.

SUBJECTS

16 general practitioners from 10 practices. This report includes 3324 consultations with patients aged > or = 17, with data on measurement of blood pressure and advice about smoking and alcohol.

RESULTS

Data from questionnaire and medical notes were available for 2281 consultations. Advice on smoking was recorded in the notes in 30.9% of cases in which a patient reported it (for alcohol and measurement of blood pressure, 44.4% and 82.7% of cases respectively). In 516 cases analysis of audio tape and review of records was performed. Advice on smoking was recorded in the patient's notes in 28.6% of cases in which it was detected on audio tape (for alcohol, 31.1% of cases). In 335 consultations data from audio tape and questionnaire were available. Advice on smoking was reported by patients in 73.9% of cases in which it was detected on audio tape (for alcohol, 75.0% of cases).

CONCLUSIONS

Review of the medical record is a reasonably accurate method of assessing measurement of blood pressure in the consultation but would lead to significant underestimation of advice about smoking and alcohol.

摘要

目的

确定患者报告的健康促进活动中有多大比例记录在全科医疗记录中,并将这些评估健康促进的方法与录音带分析进行比较。

设计

对不同预约时长的对照试验中获得的数据进行二次分析。每次会诊后检查病历,并邀请患者完成一份问卷。对会诊的一个子样本进行录音。

地点

诺丁汉郡。

研究对象

来自10家诊所的16名全科医生。本报告包括3324次与年龄≥17岁患者的会诊,其中有血压测量以及吸烟和饮酒建议的数据。

结果

有2281次会诊可获得问卷和病历的数据。在患者报告吸烟的病例中,30.9%的病例病历中有吸烟建议记录(饮酒和血压测量建议记录的病例分别为44.4%和82.7%)。对516例病例进行了录音带分析和病历审查。在录音带中检测到吸烟建议的病例中,28.6%的病例病历中有记录(饮酒建议记录的病例为31.1%)。在335次会诊中可获得录音带和问卷的数据。在录音带中检测到吸烟建议的病例中,73.9%的病例患者报告了吸烟建议(饮酒建议报告的病例为75.0%)。

结论

审查病历是会诊中评估血压测量的一种相当准确的方法,但会导致对吸烟和饮酒建议的严重低估。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

7
On the Oregon trail: rationing health care.在俄勒冈小道上:医疗保健配给
BMJ. 1991 Jan 5;302(6767):1-2. doi: 10.1136/bmj.302.6767.1.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验