Baker C N, Tenover F C
Nosocomial Pathogens Laboratory Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia 30333, USA.
J Clin Microbiol. 1996 Nov;34(11):2654-9. doi: 10.1128/jcm.34.11.2654-2659.1996.
We compared the results of the Alamar broth microdilution susceptibility testing method with the results of the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards reference broth microdilution method for 119 gram-positive organisms. The strains were tested for their susceptibilities to 20 antimicrobial agents. Only appropriate antimicrobial agents were evaluated for each species of bacteria. Absolute categorical agreement between the reference method and the test method was 91.5% for enterococci, 99.8% for oxacillin-susceptible staphylococci, and 97.4% for oxacillin-resistant staphylococci. Essential agreement (percent complete agreement plus percent minor errors) was > 99% for all organisms tested. The results for enterococci showed no very major errors, one major error with ofloxacin, and numerous minor errors with the quinolones. However, all except one of the minor errors were within +/- 1 log2 dilution of the reference result. For staphylococci, only 2 very major errors (one each with chloramphenicol and oxacillin), 1 major error (chloramphenicol), and 15 minor errors (multiple drugs) were observed. The Alamar colorimetric system was easy to use and the results were easy to read. It appears to be an acceptable method for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of staphylococci and enterococci.
我们将119株革兰氏阳性菌的阿拉玛肉汤微量稀释药敏试验方法的结果与美国国家临床实验室标准委员会参考肉汤微量稀释法的结果进行了比较。对这些菌株进行了20种抗菌药物的药敏测试。仅针对每种细菌评估了合适的抗菌药物。参考方法与测试方法之间的绝对分类一致性,肠球菌为91.5%,对苯唑西林敏感的葡萄球菌为99.8%,对苯唑西林耐药的葡萄球菌为97.4%。所有受试菌株的基本一致性(完全一致性百分比加上微小误差百分比)均>99%。肠球菌的结果显示无非常大的误差,对氧氟沙星有1个大误差,对喹诺酮类药物有多个微小误差。然而,除1个微小误差外,所有微小误差均在参考结果的±1 log2稀释范围内。对于葡萄球菌,仅观察到2个非常大的误差(氯霉素和苯唑西林各1个)、1个大误差(氯霉素)和15个微小误差(多种药物)。阿拉玛比色系统易于使用,结果易于读取。它似乎是一种可接受的葡萄球菌和肠球菌抗菌药敏测试方法。