Suppr超能文献

两性霉素B与唑类药物在白色念珠菌中的体外相互作用。

In vitro interaction between amphotericin B and azoles in Candida albicans.

作者信息

Vazquez J A, Arganoza M T, Vaishampayan J K, Akins R A

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Michigan, USA.

出版信息

Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1996 Nov;40(11):2511-6. doi: 10.1128/AAC.40.11.2511.

Abstract

The use of azole prophylaxis as a measure to prevent invasive fungal infections in high-risk patients is increasing and is now the standard of care in many institutions. Previous studies disagree on whether preexposure of Candida albicans to azoles affects their subsequent susceptibility to amphotericin B (AmB). The present in vitro study indicates that azole exposure generates a subpopulation of cells that are not affected by subsequent exposure to AmB. These cells that are phenotypically resistant to AmB tolerated by most cells not exposed to azole. The percentage of cells that convert to phenotypic resistance to AmB varies with the concentration and the azole. Itraconazole is more effective than fluconazole in generating cells that are phenotypically resistant to AmB and that tolerate an otherwise lethal transient exposure to AmB. Until cells that are not exposed to fluconazole are simultaneously challenged with AmB, they are not protected to a significant extent from killing by AmB. Cells that are challenged with continuous exposure to AmB also acquire phenotypic resistance to AmB at increased frequencies by azole preexposure, but this requires that the azole be continuously present during incubation with AmB. In addition, Candida cells taken from mature colonies that are not actively growing are not susceptible to the short-term killing effects of AmB without azole preexposure. The adaptive responses of C. albicans to AmB and potentially other antifungal agents that may result from prior exposure to azoles in vitro or potentially in microenvironments in vivo that induce physiological changes may have major clinical implications.

摘要

在高危患者中,使用唑类药物预防措施来预防侵袭性真菌感染的情况日益增多,目前在许多机构已成为标准治疗方法。以往的研究对于白色念珠菌预先暴露于唑类药物是否会影响其随后对两性霉素B(AmB)的敏感性存在分歧。目前的体外研究表明,唑类药物暴露会产生一个不受随后AmB暴露影响的细胞亚群。这些对AmB具有表型抗性的细胞能被大多数未暴露于唑类药物的细胞所耐受。转化为对AmB表型抗性的细胞百分比随唑类药物的浓度和种类而变化。在产生对AmB具有表型抗性且能耐受原本致死性短暂AmB暴露的细胞方面,伊曲康唑比氟康唑更有效。在未同时用AmB攻击未暴露于氟康唑的细胞之前,它们在很大程度上不会受到AmB杀伤的显著保护。持续暴露于AmB攻击的细胞通过唑类药物预先暴露也会以更高频率获得对AmB的表型抗性,但这要求在与AmB孵育期间唑类药物持续存在。此外,从未活跃生长的成熟菌落中获取的念珠菌细胞在没有唑类药物预先暴露的情况下对AmB的短期杀伤作用不敏感。白色念珠菌对AmB以及可能对其他抗真菌药物的适应性反应,可能源于体外预先暴露于唑类药物,或者可能源于体内诱导生理变化的微环境,这可能具有重大的临床意义。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

2
Combination treatment of invasive fungal infections.侵袭性真菌感染的联合治疗。
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2005 Jan;18(1):163-94. doi: 10.1128/CMR.18.1.163-194.2005.
3
Combination antifungal therapy.联合抗真菌治疗。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2004 Mar;48(3):693-715. doi: 10.1128/AAC.48.3.693-715.2004.

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验