Suppr超能文献

喉咙痛患者能从青霉素治疗中获益吗?一项在全科医疗中使用青霉素V进行的随机双盲安慰剂对照临床试验。

Do patients with sore throat benefit from penicillin? A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial with penicillin V in general practice.

作者信息

Dagnelie C F, van der Graaf Y, De Melker R A

机构信息

Department of General Practice, University of Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Br J Gen Pract. 1996 Oct;46(411):589-93.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The effect of antibiotic therapy in sore throat is questionable and this dilemma has been complicated by the emergence of multiple resistant strains of micro-organisms.

AIM

A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial was undertaken in patients aged 4-60 years to assess the efficacy of penicillin V on the clinical course and bacteriological response in patients with sore throat in general practice.

METHOD

Two hundred and thirty-nine patients presenting with an acute sore throat to 37 general practices in the Netherlands who were clinically suspected of group A beta-haemolytic streptococci (GABHS) were randomized for treatment with penicillin V (n = 121) or placebo (n = 118). Resolution of sore throat, fever and return to daily activities were evaluated by the general practitioner 2 days after the start of treatment and by the patients keeping a diary for 7 days. The result of throat culture after 2 days was evaluated.

RESULTS

A difference in resolution of sore throat was present after 2 days in all patients, but was a result of GABHS-positive patients (n = 111; 46%) in favour of those randomized for penicillin V (adjusted odds ratio 5.3; 95% CI 1.9-15.1). An effect in the course of fever was also seen in GABHS-positive patients (adjusted odds ratio 5.3; 95% CI 1.02-27.7). A difference of 1-2 days was seen in clinical recovery. No difference was found in daily activities between the treatment groups. After 2 days, 4% of the penicillin-treated patients harboured GABHS compared with 75% of the placebo group.

CONCLUSION

Only GABHS-positive patients benefit from penicillin V in their clinical cure in the first few days. Therefore, rapid testing is necessary. Treatment may be beneficial with regard to the clinical course, but it is not necessary.

摘要

背景

抗生素治疗咽喉痛的效果存在疑问,而多种微生物耐药菌株的出现使这一困境更加复杂。

目的

在4至60岁的患者中进行一项随机双盲安慰剂对照临床试验,以评估青霉素V对全科医疗中咽喉痛患者临床病程和细菌学反应的疗效。

方法

荷兰37家全科诊所的239例急性咽喉痛患者,临床怀疑为A组β溶血性链球菌(GABHS)感染,随机分为青霉素V治疗组(n = 121)和安慰剂组(n = 118)。治疗开始2天后,由全科医生评估咽喉痛、发热的缓解情况以及恢复日常活动的情况,患者需记录7天的日记。评估2天后咽喉培养的结果。

结果

所有患者在2天后咽喉痛缓解情况存在差异,但这是GABHS阳性患者(n = 111;46%)的结果,倾向于随机接受青霉素V治疗的患者(调整比值比5.3;95%可信区间1.9 - 15.1)。GABHS阳性患者在发热病程中也有效果(调整比值比5.3;95%可信区间1.02 - 27.7)。临床恢复时间相差1 - 2天。治疗组之间在日常活动方面未发现差异。2天后,青霉素治疗组4%的患者携带GABHS,而安慰剂组为75%。

结论

只有GABHS阳性患者在最初几天的临床治愈中受益于青霉素V。因此,快速检测是必要的。治疗在临床病程方面可能有益,但并非必要。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

4
Antibiotics for treatment of sore throat in children and adults.抗生素治疗儿童和成人咽痛。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Dec 9;12(12):CD000023. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000023.pub5.
5
Microbiology of parapharyngeal abscesses in adults: in search of the significant pathogens.成人咽旁脓肿的微生物学研究:寻找重要的病原体。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2021 Jul;40(7):1461-1470. doi: 10.1007/s10096-021-04180-y. Epub 2021 Feb 10.
7
Antibiotics for acute bronchitis.用于急性支气管炎的抗生素
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jun 19;6(6):CD000245. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000245.pub4.
9
Clinical practice guideline: tonsillitis I. Diagnostics and nonsurgical management.临床实践指南:扁桃体炎I. 诊断与非手术治疗
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2016 Apr;273(4):973-87. doi: 10.1007/s00405-015-3872-6. Epub 2016 Jan 11.
10
Streptococcal pharyngitis in children: to treat or not to treat?儿童链球菌性咽炎:治疗还是不治疗?
Eur J Pediatr. 2014 Oct;173(10):1275-83. doi: 10.1007/s00431-014-2395-2. Epub 2014 Aug 12.

本文引用的文献

5
Penicillin in sore throat.青霉素治疗咽喉痛。
Practitioner. 1981 Feb;225(1352):234-9.
8
Management of streptococcal pharyngitis reconsidered.重新审视链球菌性咽炎的管理
Pediatr Infect Dis. 1985 Sep-Oct;4(5):518-26. doi: 10.1097/00006454-198509000-00016.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验