• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年重型闭合性颅脑损伤患者的长期功能状态及死亡率

Long-term functional status and mortality of elderly patients with severe closed head injuries.

作者信息

Kilaru S, Garb J, Emhoff T, Fiallo V, Simon B, Swiencicki T, Lee K F

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Baystate Medical Center, Springfield, Massachusetts 01199, USA.

出版信息

J Trauma. 1996 Dec;41(6):957-63. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199612000-00003.

DOI:10.1097/00005373-199612000-00003
PMID:8970546
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate long-term clinical outcome of elderly patients with severe closed head injuries.

DESIGN

Retrospective study.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All patients older than 65 years of age admitted to a regional trauma center with a diagnosis of closed head injury and an admission Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of 8 or less. Using chi 2 analysis, Student's t test, and multiple logistic regression, we correlated age, sex, mechanism of injury, pupillary reactivity, alcohol and drug use, admission GCS score, Injury Severity Score, Revised Trauma Score, heart rate, and blood pressure to the main outcome measures, i.e. long-term functional outcome and mortality.

RESULTS

Among 40 elderly patients who met the criteria, 27% were still alive at the end of 38 +/- 3 month follow-up. Eighty-five percent of patients who were discharged from the hospital were still alive long-term, but did not show significant neurologic improvement. In a univariate analysis, GCS and pupillary reactivity were predictive for long-term functional outcome and mortality. In a multivariate analysis, GCS and heart rate were predictive. All patients with an admission GCS score of 3 died in-hospital. All patients with an admission GCS score of 3 to 7 were either deceased or lived in persistent vegetative or dependent functional states.

CONCLUSIONS

Elderly patients with severe closed head injuries have high in-hospital mortality. Those who survived the hospital stay had high long-term survival, but did not show significant functional improvement. Prediction of long-term functional status is vital to the trauma care of elderly patients with severe closed head injuries.

摘要

目的

评估老年重度闭合性颅脑损伤患者的长期临床结局。

设计

回顾性研究。

患者与方法

所有年龄大于65岁、因闭合性颅脑损伤入住某地区创伤中心且入院时格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)评分为8分及以下的患者。我们采用卡方分析、学生t检验和多元逻辑回归,将年龄、性别、损伤机制、瞳孔反应性、酒精和药物使用情况、入院时GCS评分、损伤严重程度评分、修订创伤评分、心率和血压与主要结局指标,即长期功能结局和死亡率进行关联分析。

结果

在符合标准的40例老年患者中,38±3个月随访结束时27%仍存活。出院患者中有85%长期存活,但未显示出明显的神经功能改善。单因素分析中,GCS评分和瞳孔反应性可预测长期功能结局和死亡率。多因素分析中,GCS评分和心率具有预测性。所有入院时GCS评分为3分的患者均在院内死亡。所有入院时GCS评分为3至7分的患者要么死亡,要么处于持续植物状态或依赖性功能状态。

结论

老年重度闭合性颅脑损伤患者院内死亡率高。存活至出院的患者长期生存率高,但未显示出明显的功能改善。预测长期功能状态对老年重度闭合性颅脑损伤患者的创伤护理至关重要。

相似文献

1
Long-term functional status and mortality of elderly patients with severe closed head injuries.老年重型闭合性颅脑损伤患者的长期功能状态及死亡率
J Trauma. 1996 Dec;41(6):957-63. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199612000-00003.
2
Outcome in patients with blunt head trauma and a Glasgow Coma Scale score of 3 at presentation.入院时格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分为3分的钝性头部创伤患者的预后。
J Neurosurg. 2009 Oct;111(4):683-7. doi: 10.3171/2009.2.JNS08817.
3
Do trauma patients with a Glasgow Coma Scale score of 3 and bilateral fixed and dilated pupils have any chance of survival?格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分为3分且双侧瞳孔固定散大的创伤患者有存活的可能吗?
J Trauma. 2006 Feb;60(2):274-8. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000197177.13379.f4.
4
Outcomes of blunt head trauma without intracranial pressure monitoring.未进行颅内压监测的钝性头部创伤的结果
Am Surg. 2007 May;73(5):447-50.
5
Analysis of long-term (median 10.5 years) outcomes in children presenting with traumatic brain injury and an initial Glasgow Coma Scale score of 3 or 4.对初始格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分为3或4分的创伤性脑损伤患儿的长期(中位时间10.5年)预后分析。
J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2015 Oct;16(4):410-9. doi: 10.3171/2015.3.PEDS14679. Epub 2015 Jul 3.
6
Isolated traumatic brain injury: Routine intubation for Glasgow Coma Scale 7 or 8 may be harmful!单纯性创伤性脑损伤:格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分为 7 或 8 分的患者常规插管可能有害!
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2021 May 1;90(5):874-879. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000003123.
7
The effect of age on functional outcome in mild traumatic brain injury: 6-month report of a prospective multicenter trial.年龄对轻度创伤性脑损伤功能结局的影响:一项前瞻性多中心试验的6个月报告。
J Trauma. 2004 May;56(5):1042-8. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000127767.83267.33.
8
Defining the limits of survivorship after very severe head injury.
J Trauma. 1997 Jan;42(1):7-10. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199701000-00003.
9
Secondary insults in severe head injury--do multiply injured patients do worse?重度颅脑损伤中的继发性损伤——多发伤患者的情况是否更糟?
Crit Care Med. 2001 Jun;29(6):1116-23. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200106000-00004.
10
Predictors of outcome in civilians with gunshot wounds to the head upon presentation.头部枪伤平民就诊时的预后预测因素。
J Neurosurg. 2014 Sep;121(3):645-52. doi: 10.3171/2014.5.JNS131872. Epub 2014 Jul 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of Sociodemographic, Premorbid, and Injury-Related Factors on Patient-Reported Outcome Trajectories after Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI).社会人口学、病前及损伤相关因素对创伤性脑损伤(TBI)后患者报告结局轨迹的影响
J Clin Med. 2023 Mar 14;12(6):2246. doi: 10.3390/jcm12062246.
2
Identification of Seniors at Risk Scoring in Geriatric Trauma: Exploring Clinical Outcome Correlations.老年创伤风险评分的识别:探索临床结局相关性
J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2022 Apr-Jun;15(2):93-98. doi: 10.4103/jets.jets_19_22. Epub 2022 Jun 27.
3
Predictors of Mortality, Withdrawal of Life-Sustaining Measures, and Discharge Disposition in Octogenarians with Subdural Hematomas.
八旬老年患者硬膜下血肿患者的死亡率、停止生命维持治疗和出院去向的预测因素。
World Neurosurg. 2022 Jan;157:e179-e187. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.09.121. Epub 2021 Oct 7.
4
Risk factors predicting prognosis and outcome of elderly patients with isolated traumatic brain injury.预测老年单纯性创伤性脑损伤患者预后和结局的危险因素。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2018 Nov 3;13(1):277. doi: 10.1186/s13018-018-0975-y.
5
Ten year maturation period in a level-I trauma center, a cohort comparison study.一级创伤中心的十年成熟期:一项队列比较研究
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2017 Oct;43(5):685-690. doi: 10.1007/s00068-016-0722-1. Epub 2016 Sep 15.
6
The Value of the Trauma Mechanism in the Triage of Severely Injured Elderly.创伤机制在老年重伤员分诊中的价值
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2009 Feb;35(1):49-55. doi: 10.1007/s00068-008-7069-1. Epub 2008 Mar 18.
7
Traumatic Brain Injury in the Elderly: Is it as Bad as we Think?老年人创伤性脑损伤:是否如我们所想的那般严重?
Curr Transl Geriatr Exp Gerontol Rep. 2012 Jul 6;1(3):171-178. doi: 10.1007/s13670-012-0017-2. eCollection 2012.
8
Neurological outcomes of neurosurgical operations for multiple trauma elderly patients in Hong Kong.香港老年多发伤患者神经外科手术的神经学转归
J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2011 Jul;4(3):346-50. doi: 10.4103/0974-2700.83861.
9
Evaluation of the effect of intensity of care on mortality after traumatic brain injury.评估创伤性脑损伤后护理强度对死亡率的影响。
Crit Care Med. 2008 Jan;36(1):282-90. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000297884.86058.8A.
10
Trends in hospitalization after injury: older women are displacing young men.受伤后住院情况的趋势:老年女性正在取代年轻男性。
Inj Prev. 2003 Sep;9(3):214-9. doi: 10.1136/ip.9.3.214.