• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

重度颅脑损伤:结果预测与生存分析

Severe head injuries: an outcome prediction and survival analysis.

作者信息

Combes P, Fauvage B, Colonna M, Passagia J G, Chirossel J P, Jacquot C

机构信息

Département d' Anesthésie Réanimation 1, CHU de Grenoble, France.

出版信息

Intensive Care Med. 1996 Dec;22(12):1391-5. doi: 10.1007/BF01709556.

DOI:10.1007/BF01709556
PMID:8986491
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To identify the predictors determined early after admission and associated with unfavorable outcome or early (within 48 h) death after severe head injury.

DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

SETTING

A neurosurgical intensive care unit in a university hospital.

PATIENTS

198 consecutive comatose patients hospitalized from 1989 to 1992.

RESULTS

Logistic regression showed that a combination of age, best motor response score from the Glasgow Coma Scale, and hypoxia provided a good prediction model of unfavorable outcome (sensitivity = 0.93). The length of participation of survivors was 6 to 61 months (median 27.1). The Cox model demonstrated age, motor score less than 3, mydriasis, and hypoxia as poor prognosis factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinicians can determine the odds of a good outcome from the combination of three easily measurable factors using a simple diagram constructed from logistic regression. Survival analysis showed that motor score adjusted values greater than 3 had the same prognosis.

摘要

目的

确定入院后早期确定的、与重型颅脑损伤后不良结局或早期(48小时内)死亡相关的预测因素。

设计

前瞻性队列研究。

地点

一家大学医院的神经外科重症监护病房。

患者

1989年至1992年连续收治的198例昏迷患者。

结果

逻辑回归显示,年龄、格拉斯哥昏迷量表最佳运动反应评分和低氧血症相结合可提供良好的不良结局预测模型(敏感性=0.93)。幸存者的参与时长为6至61个月(中位数27.1)。Cox模型显示年龄、运动评分低于3分、瞳孔散大和低氧血症为预后不良因素。

结论

临床医生可以使用由逻辑回归构建的简单图表,通过三个易于测量的因素的组合来确定良好结局的几率。生存分析表明,运动评分校正值大于3具有相同的预后。

相似文献

1
Severe head injuries: an outcome prediction and survival analysis.重度颅脑损伤:结果预测与生存分析
Intensive Care Med. 1996 Dec;22(12):1391-5. doi: 10.1007/BF01709556.
2
Comparison of the APACHE III, APACHE II and Glasgow Coma Scale in acute head injury for prediction of mortality and functional outcome.急性颅脑损伤中APACHE III、APACHE II和格拉斯哥昏迷量表对死亡率及功能转归预测的比较
Intensive Care Med. 1997 Jan;23(1):77-84. doi: 10.1007/s001340050294.
3
Acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE II) and Glasgow coma scores as predictors of outcome from intensive care after cardiac arrest.急性生理学与慢性健康状况评估(APACHE II)及格拉斯哥昏迷评分作为心脏骤停后重症监护结局的预测指标。
Crit Care Med. 1991 Dec;19(12):1465-73. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199112000-00005.
4
Predictive value of scoring system in severe pediatric head injury.评分系统在小儿重度颅脑损伤中的预测价值。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2007;43(11):861-9.
5
Predictors of outcome in severely head-injured children.重度颅脑损伤儿童预后的预测因素
Crit Care Med. 2001 Mar;29(3):534-40. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200103000-00011.
6
Mortality prediction in head trauma patients: performance of Glasgow Coma Score and general severity systems.头部创伤患者的死亡率预测:格拉斯哥昏迷评分和一般严重程度系统的表现。
Crit Care Med. 1998 Jan;26(1):142-8. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199801000-00030.
7
Outcome and prognostic factors in head injuries with an admission Glasgow Coma Scale score of 3.入院时格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分为3分的颅脑损伤的结局及预后因素
Arch Surg. 2004 Oct;139(10):1066-8. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.139.10.1066.
8
Predictors of outcome in civilians with gunshot wounds to the head upon presentation.头部枪伤平民就诊时的预后预测因素。
J Neurosurg. 2014 Sep;121(3):645-52. doi: 10.3171/2014.5.JNS131872. Epub 2014 Jul 4.
9
Variation in therapy and outcome for pediatric head trauma patients.小儿头部创伤患者治疗及预后的差异。
Crit Care Med. 2001 May;29(5):1056-61. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200105000-00037.
10
Outcome after severe head injury: an analysis of prediction based upon comparison of neural network versus logistic regression analysis.
Neurol Res. 1997 Jun;19(3):274-80. doi: 10.1080/01616412.1997.11740813.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical Outcome Prediction of Early Brain Injury in Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: the SHELTER-Score.颅内动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血早期脑损伤的临床转归预测:SHELTER 评分。
Neurocrit Care. 2024 Apr;40(2):438-447. doi: 10.1007/s12028-023-01879-y. Epub 2023 Nov 29.
2
Prognostic properties of the association between the S-100B protein levels and the mean cerebral blood flow velocity in patients diagnosed with severe traumatic brain injury.S-100B蛋白水平与诊断为重度创伤性脑损伤患者的平均脑血流速度之间关联的预后特性
Biomed Rep. 2022 May 19;17(1):58. doi: 10.3892/br.2022.1541. eCollection 2022 Jul.
3
Clinical outcome and prognostic factors in elderly traumatic brain injury patients receiving neurointensive care.

本文引用的文献

1
Index for rating diagnostic tests.诊断试验评级指数。
Cancer. 1950 Jan;3(1):32-5. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(1950)3:1<32::aid-cncr2820030106>3.0.co;2-3.
2
Psychosocial recovery after head injury.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1993 Oct;74(10):1041-6. doi: 10.1016/0003-9993(93)90059-j.
3
Further experience in the management of severe head injury.重度颅脑损伤管理的进一步经验
J Neurosurg. 1981 Mar;54(3):289-99. doi: 10.3171/jns.1981.54.3.0289.
老年创伤性脑损伤患者接受神经重症监护的临床转归和预后因素。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2019 Jun;161(6):1243-1254. doi: 10.1007/s00701-019-03893-6. Epub 2019 Apr 13.
4
A Critical Review for Developing Accurate and Dynamic Predictive Models Using Machine Learning Methods in Medicine and Health Care.关于在医学与医疗保健领域使用机器学习方法开发准确且动态预测模型的批判性综述。
J Med Syst. 2017 Apr;41(4):69. doi: 10.1007/s10916-017-0715-6. Epub 2017 Mar 11.
5
Recommendations for the Critical Care Management of Devastating Brain Injury: Prognostication, Psychosocial, and Ethical Management : A Position Statement for Healthcare Professionals from the Neurocritical Care Society.严重脑损伤的重症监护管理建议:预后评估、心理社会及伦理管理:神经重症监护学会给医疗专业人员的立场声明
Neurocrit Care. 2015 Aug;23(1):4-13. doi: 10.1007/s12028-015-0137-6.
6
Knowledge of Glasgow coma scale by air-rescue physicians.空中救援医师对格拉斯哥昏迷量表的认知。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2009 Sep 1;17:39. doi: 10.1186/1757-7241-17-39.
7
Defenestration in children younger than 6 years old: mortality predictors in severe head trauma.6岁以下儿童的去骨瓣减压术:重度颅脑创伤的死亡率预测因素
Childs Nerv Syst. 2009 Sep;25(9):1077-83. doi: 10.1007/s00381-009-0924-5. Epub 2009 Jun 24.
8
Severe head injury and the risk of early death.严重颅脑损伤与早期死亡风险。
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2006 Sep;77(9):1054-9. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2005.087056. Epub 2006 Jun 1.
9
Admission of patients with severe and moderate traumatic brain injury to specialized ICU facilities: a search for triage criteria.
Intensive Care Med. 2005 Jun;31(6):799-806. doi: 10.1007/s00134-005-2628-y. Epub 2005 Apr 16.
4
Systematic selection of prognostic features in patients with severe head injury.重型颅脑损伤患者预后特征的系统选择
Neurosurgery. 1980 Apr;6(4):362-70.
5
Prognostic implications of early multimodality evoked potentials in severely head-injured patients. A prospective study.严重颅脑损伤患者早期多模态诱发电位的预后意义:一项前瞻性研究。
J Neurosurg. 1981 Aug;55(2):227-36. doi: 10.3171/jns.1981.55.2.0227.
6
Improved confidence of outcome prediction in severe head injury. A comparative analysis of the clinical examination, multimodality evoked potentials, CT scanning, and intracranial pressure.提高重型颅脑损伤预后预测的可信度。临床检查、多模态诱发电位、CT扫描及颅内压的对比分析。
J Neurosurg. 1981 Jun;54(6):751-62. doi: 10.3171/jns.1981.54.6.0751.
7
Influence of the type of intracranial lesion on outcome from severe head injury.颅内损伤类型对重型颅脑损伤预后的影响。
J Neurosurg. 1982 Jan;56(1):26-32. doi: 10.3171/jns.1982.56.1.0026.
8
Chart for outcome prediction in severe head injury.重型颅脑损伤预后预测图表。
J Neurosurg. 1983 Aug;59(2):294-7. doi: 10.3171/jns.1983.59.2.0294.
9
Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness. A practical scale.昏迷与意识障碍评估。实用量表。
Lancet. 1974 Jul 13;2(7872):81-4. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(74)91639-0.
10
Residual complaints of patients two years after severe head injury.
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1985 Jan;48(1):21-8. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.48.1.21.