Tolfvenstam T, Rudén U, Broliden K
Swedish Institute for Infectious Disease Control, Stockholm.
Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 1996 Mar;3(2):147-50. doi: 10.1128/cdli.3.2.147-150.1996.
Three different enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) (Parvoscan-B19, IBL parvovirus B19, and IDEIA parvovirus B19) and one immunofluorescence assay (Biotrin Parvo B19 IFA) were evaluated for detection of parvovirus B19 immunoglobulin M (IgM) antibodies in 203 clinical serum samples. An IgM antibody capture radioimmunoassay was used as a reference test. Serum specimens obtained from patients with clinical symptoms suggestive of parvovirus B19 infections were used to evaluate the sensitivities of the assays, which were shown to be comparable for the Biotrin IFA and IDEIA (97%) and lower for the other two EIAs (90%). In order to test the specificity of the assays, clinical serum samples with IgM antibodies against other viruses were examined, as well as sera with rheumatoid factor activity and sera from healthy pregnant women. The specificities of B19 IgM antibody detection were 96% for the Biotrin IFA, 96% for IDEIA, 90% for Parvoscan, and 88% for the IBL assay. These results show that all four assays can be recommended for diagnostic purposes, although false-positive results may be seen with other acute viral infections, healthy pregnant women, and rheumatoid factor-positive samples.
对三种不同的酶免疫测定法(EIAs)(Parvoscan - B19、IBL细小病毒B19和IDEIA细小病毒B19)以及一种免疫荧光测定法(Biotrin Parvo B19 IFA)进行了评估,以检测203份临床血清样本中的细小病毒B19免疫球蛋白M(IgM)抗体。以IgM抗体捕获放射免疫测定法作为参考检测方法。从有临床症状提示细小病毒B19感染的患者中获取血清标本,用于评估这些检测方法的敏感性,结果显示Biotrin IFA和IDEIA的敏感性相当(97%),另外两种EIA的敏感性较低(90%)。为了检测这些检测方法的特异性,对含有针对其他病毒的IgM抗体的临床血清样本、具有类风湿因子活性的血清以及健康孕妇的血清进行了检测。Biotrin IFA检测B19 IgM抗体的特异性为96%,IDEIA为96%,Parvoscan为90%,IBL测定法为88%。这些结果表明,尽管在其他急性病毒感染、健康孕妇以及类风湿因子阳性样本中可能会出现假阳性结果,但所有这四种检测方法均可推荐用于诊断目的。