Brazier J E, Walters S J, Nicholl J P, Kohler B
Sheffield Centre For Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, UK.
Qual Life Res. 1996 Apr;5(2):195-204. doi: 10.1007/BF00434741.
An important methodological issue in measuring health-related quality of life is whether instruments such as SF-36 and EQ can be used on an elderly population. This paper aims to test the completion, reliability and validity of the SF-36 and Euroqol on an elderly female population, and to compare them with the OPCS Disability Survey. Three hundred and eighty women aged 75 and over participated in a randomized controlled trial of the use of clodronate provided the sample. As part of the trial, patients were asked to complete the UK SF-36 and Euroqol, and the OPCS disability survey instrument administered by interview in a hospital clinic at baseline. A random subsample of respondents were retested six months later. The SF-36 achieved poorer levels of completion by dimension (68.1%-88.9%) than the OPCS (99.2%) and Euroqol (84%-93.5%) instruments. There were no major floor effects in the distribution of scores, except for the role dimensions of SF-36. Correlation between test-retest were significant for all instruments, but lower for the role dimensions and social functioning of SF-36, and these dimensions also had 95% Cls for the mean differences in excess of 10 points. There was substantial agreement between the three instruments, and evidence for their construct validity against age and recent use of health services. The sensitivities of the instruments were tested through hypothetical changes in health status. There was some evidence of greater sensitivity to lower levels of morbidity in the SF-36. Where brevity is required and the health changes are expected to be substantial, then EQ may be sufficient. For greater sensitivity SF-36 seems to have an advantage, however lower completion rates and problems with consistency suggest it requires adaptation. One solution would be to use interviewer administration. Another would be to change the SF-36 to make it more suitable for use in elderly people, although this may reduce its usefulness as a generic instrument.
衡量健康相关生活质量时一个重要的方法学问题是,诸如SF-36和欧洲五维度健康量表(EQ)之类的工具是否可用于老年人群。本文旨在测试SF-36和欧洲五维度健康量表在老年女性人群中的完成情况、信度和效度,并将它们与英国国家统计局残疾调查(OPCS Disability Survey)进行比较。380名75岁及以上的女性参与了一项使用氯膦酸盐的随机对照试验,该试验提供了样本。作为试验的一部分,患者被要求在基线时在医院门诊完成英国版SF-36和欧洲五维度健康量表,以及通过访谈进行的英国国家统计局残疾调查问卷。六个月后,对随机抽取的受访者子样本进行重新测试。与英国国家统计局残疾调查(完成率99.2%)和欧洲五维度健康量表(完成率84%-93.5%)相比,SF-36各维度的完成率较低(68.1%-88.9%)。除了SF-36的角色维度外,分数分布中没有明显的地板效应。所有工具的重测相关性均显著,但SF-36的角色维度和社会功能维度的相关性较低,并且这些维度的平均差异的95%置信区间超过10分。这三种工具之间存在实质性的一致性,并且有证据表明它们针对年龄和近期医疗服务使用情况具有结构效度。通过假设健康状况的变化来测试工具的敏感性。有一些证据表明,SF-36对较低发病率水平的敏感性更高。在需要简短工具且预期健康变化较大的情况下,那么欧洲五维度健康量表可能就足够了。然而,对于更高的敏感性,SF-36似乎具有优势,但完成率较低和一致性问题表明它需要调整。一种解决方案是采用访谈员协助填写。另一种方法是对SF-36进行修改,使其更适合老年人使用,尽管这可能会降低其作为通用工具的效用。