Christopher T, Carstensen E L
Rochester Center for Biomedical Ultrasound, University of Rochester, NY 14627, USA.
Ultrasound Med Biol. 1996;22(8):1103-16. doi: 10.1016/s0301-5629(96)00099-3.
Formulation of indices that can be used as predictors of biological effects of ultrasound involves a process called derating, in which measurements of the sound field made in water are extrapolated to estimates of the magnitude of the sound fields in the tissues of the body. All indices that have been formulated up to the present time assume that the propagation of ultrasound is linear. In fact, under most exposure conditions for which biological effects may be a concern, sound propagation is highly nonlinear. A nonlinear propagation model has been used in this study to evaluate the nature of the effects that occur under realistic exposure conditions encountered in diagnostic procedures. Because of the way that the thermal index is defined, it turns out that ignoring nonlinear propagation leads to underestimates of tissue temperature increments that typically are less than 40%. As currently implemented, the mechanical index may be underestimated by more than a factor of two because it ignores the saturation of the sound fields that result from nonlinear propagation. For large propagation distances in soft tissues (e.g., 10 cm at 3 MHz in liver); however, it is physically difficult to exceed tissue pressures corresponding to MI > 2 because of these same saturation phenomena.
制定可作为超声生物效应预测指标的指数涉及一个称为降额的过程,即在该过程中,将在水中进行的声场测量外推至对人体组织中声场大小的估计。截至目前已制定的所有指数都假定超声传播是线性的。实际上,在大多数可能关注生物效应的暴露条件下,声音传播是高度非线性的。本研究中使用了非线性传播模型来评估在诊断程序中遇到的实际暴露条件下所发生效应的性质。由于热指数的定义方式,结果表明忽略非线性传播会导致对组织温度增量的低估,通常低估幅度小于40%。按照目前的实施方式,机械指数可能会被低估两倍以上,因为它忽略了非线性传播导致的声场饱和。然而,对于软组织中的大传播距离(例如,在肝脏中3MHz频率下传播10厘米),由于这些相同的饱和现象,实际上很难超过对应于MI>2的组织压力。