Poulter N R, Chang C L, Farley T M, Marmot M G
Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London Medical School.
J Epidemiol Community Health. 1996 Dec;50(6):674-80. doi: 10.1136/jech.50.6.674.
To evaluate the reliability of data supplied in a case-control study by proxy respondents for cases who were too ill to do so themselves.
A hospital based, case-control study of the current use of oral contraceptives (OC) and cardiovascular diseases. Data from "true" controls matched to a subset of cases were compared with those supplied by proxy respondents about the true controls.
Hospitals in 21 centres from Africa, Asia, Europe, and Latin America.
For a subset of cases, 403 pairs of controls-one "true" and one proxy-were interviewed. "True" controls were matched by age, place, and time of admission and were admitted with 1 of 27 permissible diagnoses not associated with OC use. Proxy controls were either relatives or friends of true controls.
Levels of concordance between data from proxy and true controls were high for most variables regarding recent events, including current OC use, but were greatly diminished when detailed information, particularly from the past, was required. Husbands were usually the best proxy, although this was question-specific. The sensitivity and specificity of proxy responses were 93% (95% confidence intervals: 77%, 99%) and 100% (98%, 100%) respectively, for current use of OC. Assuming the misclassification of current OC use by proxy cases is similar to that produced by proxy controls, the estimated impact of using proxy data on risk estimates associated with current OC use was to bias the overall estimate of risk of stroke by less than 3% and the risks of both acute myocardial infarction and venous thromboembolism by less than 1%.
Friends or relatives, and particularly husbands, provided reliable information when used as proxy respondents for young women. The estimated impact of misclassification by proxy respondents on overall risk estimates in the WHO collaborative study was less than that which would have arisen if information from proxy respondents had not been used.
评估在病例对照研究中,由替代受访者为病情过重无法自行提供信息的病例提供的数据的可靠性。
一项基于医院的病例对照研究,涉及口服避孕药(OC)的当前使用情况和心血管疾病。将与部分病例匹配的“真实”对照的数据与替代受访者提供的关于真实对照的数据进行比较。
来自非洲、亚洲、欧洲和拉丁美洲21个中心的医院。
对于部分病例,对403对对照进行了访谈,一对对照中一个是“真实”对照,另一个是替代对照。“真实”对照根据年龄、地点和入院时间进行匹配,因27种与使用OC无关的允许诊断之一入院。替代对照是真实对照的亲属或朋友。
对于大多数关于近期事件的变量,包括当前OC使用情况,替代对照和真实对照的数据一致性水平较高,但在需要详细信息(尤其是过去的信息)时,一致性水平大幅下降。丈夫通常是最佳替代受访者,不过这因问题而异。对于当前OC使用情况,替代受访者回答的敏感性和特异性分别为93%(95%置信区间:77%,99%)和100%(98%,100%)。假设替代病例对当前OC使用情况的错误分类与替代对照产生的错误分类相似,使用替代数据对与当前OC使用相关的风险估计的影响是,使中风风险的总体估计偏差小于3%,急性心肌梗死和静脉血栓栓塞的风险偏差小于1%。
朋友或亲属,尤其是丈夫,作为年轻女性的替代受访者时提供了可靠信息。在世界卫生组织合作研究中,替代受访者错误分类对总体风险估计的影响小于不使用替代受访者信息时可能产生的影响。