Suppr超能文献

贝叶斯群体方法与商业软件中实现的两种方法的比较。

A comparison of a Bayesian population method with two methods as implemented in commercially available software.

作者信息

Bennett J E, Wakefield J C

机构信息

Department of Mathematics, Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Pharmacokinet Biopharm. 1996 Aug;24(4):403-32. doi: 10.1007/BF02353520.

Abstract

In this paper we describe and discuss three specific estimation procedures that are available within commercially available population software packages. The first version of NONMEM (l) was released in 1979 and later versions are the standard analysis tools in both industry and academia. Recently, two commercially available pieces of software have become available. PPHARM was released during 1994 and POPKAN was released in 1995. We provide descriptions and critique the FOCE method within NONMEM, the two-step algorithm within PPHARM and the Markov chain Monte Carlo method that is utilized by POPKAN. We use simulated data generated from a monoexponential model to evaluate the parameter estimation capabilities of these methods within the three software tools. In particular we investigate the effect on parameter estimation of increasing both interindividual and intraindividual variability.

摘要

在本文中,我们描述并讨论了三种可用于市售群体软件包的具体估计程序。NONMEM(1)的第一个版本于1979年发布,后续版本是行业和学术界的标准分析工具。最近,有两款市售软件可供使用。PPHARM于1994年发布,POPKAN于1995年发布。我们对NONMEM中的FOCE方法、PPHARM中的两步算法以及POPKAN所采用的马尔可夫链蒙特卡罗方法进行了描述和评论。我们使用从单指数模型生成的模拟数据来评估这三种软件工具中这些方法的参数估计能力。特别是,我们研究了个体间和个体内变异性增加对参数估计的影响。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验