Suppr超能文献

乳糜泻筛查:非乳糜泻儿童中抗麦醇溶蛋白抗体(AGA)低滴度的意义。

Screening for coeliac disease: the meaning of low titers of anti-gliadin antibodies (AGA) in non-coeliac children.

作者信息

Bonamico M, Ballati G, Mariani P, Latini M, Triglione P, Rana I, Porro E, Mesturino M A, Criscione S

机构信息

First Pediatric Clinic, University La Sapienza, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Eur J Epidemiol. 1997 Jan;13(1):55-9. doi: 10.1023/a:1007301424656.

Abstract

Coeliac disease is diagnosed by means of jejunal biopsy, an invasive procedure. Anti-gliadin antibodies (AGA) have therefore been used in the first screening of the disease. On the other hand, low titers of AGA are widely detected also in normal subjects. In order to investigate if low levels of AGA could be correlated with laboratory and clinical data, we performed a study on 167 subjects with various illnesses, such as recurrent abdominal pain, failure to thrive, short stature, diarrhoea or constipation, cow-milk protein intolerance and/or food allergy, recurrent vomiting or previous gastroenteritis, all non coeliac conditions which have been associated with AGA presence. Seventy coeliac children, all biopsied, were selected as a control group. Among the 167 cases we found 60 subjects positive for AGA (35.9%), a high proportion as compared with the general population. Only 33/167 patients, all IgG and IgA AGA positive, fulfil our laboratory and clinical criteria to perform a 'confirming' biopsy. For the 134 residual cases (14 IgA, 13 only IgG AGA positive, 107 AGA negative) a diagnosis of coeliac disease has been excluded by clinical criteria (scoring). As a whole, the patients with coeliac disease had significantly higher levels of AGA of both IgG and IgA classes (p < 0.01). On the other hand, no significant difference emerged for all the anamnestic and laboratory parameters considered between AGA+ and AGA- non-coeliac subjects. However, laboratory parameters of IgG-AGA and/or IgA-AGA positive patients were similar to those of coeliac children for ion, Xylose, total IgA count. As no biopsied case showed mucosal atrophy, it is suggested that the presence of even low AGA levels in non-coeliac children may represent a highly sensitive index of intestinal alteration causing an increased permeability to macromolecules, but it is very unlikely that one could detect coeliac children by means of Ig-AGA among such illnesses and normal subjects. Strong clinical diagnosis and laboratory parameters are required to justify intestinal biopsies. In fact, the production of AGA seems to be a merely immunological phenomenon linked to an increased and probably transient permeability to macromolecules of the intestinal mucosa.

摘要

乳糜泻通过空肠活检来诊断,这是一种侵入性检查。因此,抗麦胶蛋白抗体(AGA)已被用于该病的初步筛查。另一方面,在正常受试者中也广泛检测到低滴度的AGA。为了研究低水平的AGA是否与实验室及临床数据相关,我们对167名患有各种疾病的受试者进行了一项研究,这些疾病包括复发性腹痛、生长发育不良、身材矮小、腹泻或便秘、牛奶蛋白不耐受和/或食物过敏、反复呕吐或既往肠胃炎,所有这些都是与AGA存在相关的非乳糜泻情况。选取70名均已接受活检的乳糜泻儿童作为对照组。在这167例病例中,我们发现60名受试者AGA呈阳性(35.9%),与普通人群相比比例较高。在167例患者中,只有33例IgG和IgA AGA均呈阳性,符合我们进行“确诊”活检的实验室和临床标准。对于其余134例病例(14例IgA、13例仅IgG AGA呈阳性、107例AGA呈阴性),根据临床标准(评分)排除了乳糜泻的诊断。总体而言,乳糜泻患者的IgG和IgA类AGA水平显著更高(p<0.01)。另一方面,在AGA阳性和AGA阴性的非乳糜泻受试者之间,所考虑的所有既往史和实验室参数均未出现显著差异。然而,IgG - AGA和/或IgA - AGA阳性患者的离子、木糖、总IgA计数等实验室参数与乳糜泻儿童相似。由于没有活检病例显示黏膜萎缩,提示非乳糜泻儿童中即使存在低水平的AGA也可能是肠道改变导致对大分子通透性增加的一个高度敏感指标,但在这些疾病和正常受试者中通过Ig - AGA检测出乳糜泻儿童的可能性极小。需要强有力的临床诊断和实验室参数来证明进行肠道活检的合理性。事实上,AGA的产生似乎仅仅是一种免疫现象,与肠道黏膜对大分子通透性增加且可能是短暂性增加有关。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验