Kaplan B
Quinnipiac College, Hamden, CT 06518, USA.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1997 Mar-Apr;4(2):94-101. doi: 10.1136/jamia.1997.0040094.
New system design and evaluation methodologies are being developed to address social, organizational, political, and other non-technological issues in medical informatics. This paper describes a social interactionist framework for researching these kinds of organizational issues, based on research within medical informatics and other disciplines over the past 20 years. It discusses how effective evaluation strategies may be undertaken to address organizational issues concerning computer information systems in medicine and health care. The paper begins with a theoretical framework for evaluation. It then describes the 4Cs of evaluation: communication, care, control, and context. Five methodological guidelines are given for conducting comprehensive evaluations that address these 4Cs. An example of an evaluation research design that fits the guidelines and was used in an evaluation of an on-line clinical imaging system is discussed. Results of the evaluation study illustrate how this approach addresses organizational concerns and the 4Cs.
新的系统设计和评估方法正在不断发展,以解决医学信息学中的社会、组织、政治和其他非技术问题。本文基于过去20年医学信息学和其他学科的研究,描述了一个用于研究这类组织问题的社会互动主义框架。它讨论了如何采取有效的评估策略来解决医学和医疗保健领域中与计算机信息系统相关的组织问题。本文首先介绍了一个评估的理论框架。然后描述了评估的4C:沟通、护理、控制和背景。给出了五条进行全面评估的方法指南,这些评估涉及这4C。讨论了一个符合这些指南并用于在线临床成像系统评估的评估研究设计实例。评估研究的结果说明了这种方法如何解决组织问题和4C。