Laflamme L, Menckel E
Karolinska Institute, Department of Public Health Sciences, Sundbyberg, Sweden.
Inj Prev. 1997 Mar;3(1):50-6. doi: 10.1136/ip.3.1.50.
The paper reviews community based epidemiological studies of injuries at school. It discusses their main findings in the light of a frame of analysis that emphasizes multidimensionality of causes, and in a Swedish context, where school injuries are legally regarded as occupational injuries.
A frame of analysis, inspired by research in the arena of occupational accident, was developed. It employs four key concepts to distinguish between injury and accident sequence, and between situational and structural factors as potential injury determinants. It also stresses the interaction between pupil, school, and community, in injury genesis. In parallel, a review of community based epidemiological studies of school injuries was undertaken after searching the relevant literature. The knowledge gathered from these studies is appraised in the light of the frame of analysis.
In general, the studies point to potential risk groups, and to hazardous locations and activities. They address injury characteristics, but largely fail to define typical mechanisms. The literature sheds little light on whether there are particular characteristics of the community, school, or pupil(s)--other than gender and age--that influence injury event occurrence.
Further research should devote attention to the sequences of events culminating in school injuries, and to the structural determinants of accident sequences. In this, surveillance systems might prove to be of great utility.
本文回顾了基于社区的校园伤害流行病学研究。根据强调病因多维度性的分析框架,并结合瑞典的情况(在瑞典,校园伤害在法律上被视为职业伤害),讨论了这些研究的主要发现。
开发了一个受职业事故领域研究启发的分析框架。它采用四个关键概念来区分伤害和事故序列,以及区分作为潜在伤害决定因素的情境因素和结构因素。它还强调了在伤害发生过程中,学生、学校和社区之间的相互作用。同时,在检索相关文献后,对基于社区的校园伤害流行病学研究进行了综述。根据分析框架对从这些研究中收集到的知识进行了评估。
总体而言,这些研究指出了潜在的风险群体、危险地点和活动。它们涉及伤害特征,但在很大程度上未能确定典型的机制。关于除性别和年龄之外,社区、学校或学生是否存在影响伤害事件发生的特定特征,文献中几乎没有相关阐述。
进一步的研究应关注导致校园伤害的事件序列,以及事故序列的结构决定因素。在这方面,监测系统可能会被证明非常有用。