Fiedler N, Kipen H
University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Piscataway 08855, USA.
Environ Health Perspect. 1997 Mar;105 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):409-15. doi: 10.1289/ehp.97105s2409.
This article provides an overview of the scientific literature in which chemically sensitive patients have been directly evaluated. For that purpose, consideration of various case definitions is offered along with summaries of subjects' demographic profiles, exposure characteristics, and symptom profiles across studies. Controlled investigations of chemically sensitive subjects without other organic illnesses are reviewed. To date, psychiatric, personality, cognitive/neurologic, immunologic, and olfactory studies have been conducted comparing subjects with primary chemical sensitivity to various control groups. Thus far, the most consistent finding is that chemically sensitive patients have a higher rate of psychiatric disorders across studies and relative to diverse comparison groups. However, since these studies are cross-sectional, causality cannot be implied. Demonstrating the role of low-level chemical exposure in a controlled environment has yet to be undertaken with this patient group and is crucial to the understanding of this phenomenon.
本文概述了对化学敏感患者进行直接评估的科学文献。为此,提供了各种病例定义的考量,以及各研究中受试者的人口统计学特征、暴露特征和症状概况的总结。对没有其他器质性疾病的化学敏感受试者的对照研究进行了综述。迄今为止,已经开展了精神病学、人格、认知/神经学、免疫学和嗅觉研究,将原发性化学敏感受试者与各种对照组进行比较。到目前为止,最一致的发现是,在各项研究中以及相对于不同的比较组,化学敏感患者患精神疾病的比例更高。然而,由于这些研究是横断面研究,无法推断因果关系。在受控环境中证明低水平化学暴露的作用,这一工作尚未在该患者群体中开展,而这对于理解这一现象至关重要。