Suppr超能文献

参与DOM项目的女性自我报告的绝经年龄的有效性和可重复性。

Validity and reproducibility of self-reported age at menopause in women participating in the DOM-project.

作者信息

den Tonkelaar I

机构信息

Julius Center for Patient Oriented Research, University of Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Maturitas. 1997 Jun;27(2):117-23. doi: 10.1016/s0378-5122(97)01122-5.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To study validity and reproducibility of self reported age at menopause.

METHODS

Subjects were 1003 and 4892 Dutch women respectively aged 58-73, who participated in a population-based breast cancer screening project. The median time since menopause was 7 years for the validity study. The time span between the two questionnaires in the reproducibility study was 7-9 years.

RESULTS

Of the women with a natural menopause, 70% recalled their age at menopause correctly to within one year. For women with a surgical menopause this percentage was 80%. The validity decreased with increasing number of years since menopause. Reproducibility to within one year was 71% for women with a natural menopause and 79% for women with a surgical menopause; 95% of the women were consistent in reporting whether they had had a natural or a surgical menopause.

CONCLUSIONS

As a consequence of this misclassification, the effect of age at menopause may be underestimated in studies relating self reported age at menopause to disease occurrence or mortality.

摘要

目的

研究自我报告的绝经年龄的有效性和可重复性。

方法

受试者分别为1003名和4892名年龄在58 - 73岁之间的荷兰女性,她们参与了一项基于人群的乳腺癌筛查项目。在有效性研究中,绝经后的中位时间为7年。在可重复性研究中,两份问卷之间的时间间隔为7 - 9年。

结果

自然绝经的女性中,70%能正确回忆起绝经年龄在1年之内。手术绝经的女性这一比例为80%。有效性随绝经后年限的增加而降低。自然绝经女性1年内的可重复性为71%,手术绝经女性为79%;95%的女性在报告自己是自然绝经还是手术绝经方面保持一致。

结论

由于这种错误分类,在将自我报告的绝经年龄与疾病发生或死亡率相关的研究中,绝经年龄的影响可能被低估。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验