Cowie R L, Revitt S G, Underwood M F, Field S K
Calgary Asthma Program, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Chest. 1997 Dec;112(6):1534-8. doi: 10.1378/chest.112.6.1534.
To determine the effect of a symptom-based and a peak flow-based action plan in preventing acute exacerbations in subjects with poorly controlled asthma.
A randomized controlled trial in which subjects who had required urgent treatment for their asthma were allocated to receive no action plan, a symptom-based plan, or a peak flow-based action plan.
A university hospital asthma clinic.
One hundred fifty subjects were recruited after attending an emergency department or a clinic for urgent treatment of asthma.
All subjects received evaluation and education for asthma before being randomly allocated to receive no action plan, a symptom-based action plan, or a peak flowmeter and a peak flow-based action plan.
Subjects were assessed by questionnaire at 3 and 6 months after enrollment with questions relating to their asthma control and their need for urgent treatment or hospital admission for asthma.
At 6 months after enrollment, although all three intervention groups experienced improvement in their asthma control, there was a striking reduction in emergency department visits for asthma only in the peak flow-based action plan group (p=0.006). No significant difference in emergency visits was apparent between the symptom-based action plan and no action plan groups.
We conclude that a peak flow-based action plan is effective, at least in the short term, in protecting patients with asthma against severe exacerbations of their disease.
确定基于症状和基于呼气峰流速的行动计划对控制不佳的哮喘患者预防急性加重的效果。
一项随机对照试验,将因哮喘需要紧急治疗的受试者分配为不接受行动计划、接受基于症状的计划或接受基于呼气峰流速的行动计划。
一家大学医院哮喘诊所。
150名受试者在急诊科或诊所因哮喘紧急治疗就诊后被招募。
所有受试者在随机分配接受不采取行动计划、基于症状的行动计划或呼气峰流速仪及基于呼气峰流速的行动计划之前,均接受哮喘评估和教育。
在入组后3个月和6个月通过问卷对受试者进行评估,问题涉及他们的哮喘控制情况以及哮喘紧急治疗或住院需求。
入组6个月后,尽管所有三个干预组的哮喘控制均有改善,但仅基于呼气峰流速的行动计划组哮喘急诊就诊次数显著减少(p=0.006)。基于症状的行动计划组和不采取行动计划组之间急诊就诊无显著差异。
我们得出结论,至少在短期内,基于呼气峰流速的行动计划能有效保护哮喘患者免受疾病严重加重的影响。