• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Laparoscopically assisted anterior resection for diverticular disease: follow-up of 100 consecutive patients.腹腔镜辅助下前切除术治疗憩室病:100例连续患者的随访
Ann Surg. 1998 Mar;227(3):335-42. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199803000-00004.
2
Laparoscopic colectomy for diverticulitis is not associated with increased morbidity when compared with non-diverticular disease.与非憩室疾病相比,腹腔镜结肠切除术治疗憩室炎并不会增加发病率。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2005 Mar;20(2):165-72. doi: 10.1007/s00384-004-0649-6. Epub 2004 Sep 30.
3
Laparoscopic resection for diverticular disease: follow-up of 500 consecutive patients.腹腔镜下憩室疾病切除术:500例连续患者的随访
Ann Surg. 2008 Dec;248(6):1092-7. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181884923.
4
Can laparoscopically assisted sigmoid resection provide uncomplicated management even in cases of complicated diverticulitis?即使在复杂憩室炎病例中,腹腔镜辅助乙状结肠切除术能否提供无并发症的治疗?
Surg Endosc. 2006 Jul;20(7):1055-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-005-0529-3. Epub 2006 May 26.
5
Colovesical fistula: not a contraindication to elective laparoscopic colectomy.结肠膀胱瘘:并非择期腹腔镜结肠切除术的禁忌证。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2005 Feb;48(2):233-6. doi: 10.1007/s10350-004-0849-8.
6
Laparoscopically-assisted resection rectopexy for rectal prolapse: ten years' experience.腹腔镜辅助直肠切除术治疗直肠脱垂:十年经验
Dis Colon Rectum. 2005 May;48(5):982-7. doi: 10.1007/s10350-004-0886-3.
7
Laparoscopic surgery for complicated diverticular disease: a single-centre experience.腹腔镜手术治疗复杂憩室病:单中心经验。
Colorectal Dis. 2012 Oct;14(10):1248-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2011.02924.x.
8
Laparoscopic colectomy for recurrent and complicated diverticulitis: a prospective study of 396 patients.腹腔镜结肠切除术治疗复发性和复杂性憩室炎:396例患者的前瞻性研究
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2004 Apr;389(2):97-103. doi: 10.1007/s00423-003-0454-7. Epub 2004 Feb 17.
9
[Results of elective segmental colectomy done with laparoscopy for complicated diverticulosis].[腹腔镜下择期节段性结肠切除术治疗复杂性憩室病的结果]
Gastroenterol Clin Biol. 2000 Feb;24(2):189-92.
10
Hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy: a single-institution experience.手辅助腹腔镜结肠切除术:单机构经验
Am Surg. 2003 Jul;69(7):578-80.

引用本文的文献

1
Preservation of the inferior mesenteric artery VS ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery in left colectomy: evaluation of functional outcomes-a prospective non-randomized controlled trial.左半结肠切除术中保留肠系膜下动脉与结扎肠系膜下动脉:功能结局评估——一项前瞻性非随机对照试验。
Updates Surg. 2023 Sep;75(6):1569-1578. doi: 10.1007/s13304-023-01593-6. Epub 2023 Jul 28.
2
Prospective evaluation of functional outcomes after laparoscopic sigmoidectomy with high tie of the inferior mesenteric artery for diverticular disease in consecutive male patients.连续男性患者因憩室病行腹腔镜乙状结肠切除术伴肠系膜下动脉高位结扎的功能结局的前瞻性评估。
Tech Coloproctol. 2020 Jan;24(1):33-40. doi: 10.1007/s10151-019-02123-6. Epub 2019 Dec 9.
3
Management of sigmoid diverticulitis: an update.乙状结肠憩室炎的管理:最新进展
Updates Surg. 2016 Mar;68(1):25-35. doi: 10.1007/s13304-016-0365-0. Epub 2016 Apr 16.
4
Single-port laparoscopic resection for diverticular disease: experiences with more than 300 consecutive patients.单孔腹腔镜手术治疗憩室病:300余例连续患者的经验
Surg Endosc. 2016 Jan;30(1):50-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4160-7. Epub 2015 Apr 1.
5
Laparoscopic management of diverticular colovesical fistula: experience in 15 cases and review of the literature.腹腔镜治疗结肠膀胱憩室瘘:15例经验及文献复习
Int Surg. 2013 Apr-Jun;98(2):101-9. doi: 10.9738/INTSURG-D-13-00024.1.
6
Surgical treatment of complicated right colonic diverticulitis: laparoscopic versus open surgery.复杂性右结肠憩室炎的手术治疗:腹腔镜与开腹手术比较。
Surg Endosc. 2012 Oct;26(10):2926-30. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2286-4. Epub 2012 Apr 27.
7
Laparoscopic sigmoidectomy for diverticulitis: a prospective study.腹腔镜乙状结肠切除术治疗憩室炎:一项前瞻性研究。
JSLS. 2010 Oct-Dec;14(4):469-75. doi: 10.4293/108680810X12924466008088.
8
Laparoscopic one-stage resection of right and left colon complicated diverticulitis equivalent to Hinchey stage I-II.腹腔镜一期切除右半结肠和左半结肠合并憩室炎相当于 Hinchey Ⅰ-Ⅱ期。
Surg Today. 2011 May;41(5):647-54. doi: 10.1007/s00595-010-4349-2. Epub 2011 May 1.
9
Hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy: rational evolution for diverticulitis.手辅助腹腔镜结肠切除术:憩室炎的合理演进
Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2006 Feb;19(1):19-25. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-939527.
10
Acute laparoscopic intervention for diverticular disease (AIDD): a feasible approach.急性腹腔镜手术治疗憩室病(AIDD):一种可行的方法。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2010 Jan;395(1):41-8. doi: 10.1007/s00423-008-0433-0. Epub 2008 Nov 11.

本文引用的文献

1
HAZARDS OF NITROUS OXIDE ANESTHESIA IN BOWEL OBSTRUCTION AND PNEUMOTHORAX.肠梗阻和气胸患者使用氧化亚氮麻醉的风险
Anesthesiology. 1965 Jan-Feb;26:61-6. doi: 10.1097/00000542-196501000-00011.
2
An appraisal of resection of the colon for diverticulitis of the sigmoid.乙状结肠憩室炎的结肠切除术评估
Ann Surg. 1953 Sep;138(3):332-43. doi: 10.1097/00000658-195313830-00005.
3
Laparoscopic Resection for Colorectal Cancer: An Australian Perspective.澳大利亚视角下的腹腔镜结直肠癌切除术
Semin Laparosc Surg. 1995 Dec;2(4):235-241. doi: 10.1053/SLAS00200235.
4
The learning curve for laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Preliminary results from a prospective analysis of 1194 laparoscopic-assisted colectomies.腹腔镜结直肠手术的学习曲线。对1194例腹腔镜辅助结肠切除术进行前瞻性分析的初步结果。
Arch Surg. 1997 Jan;132(1):41-4; discussion 45. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1997.01430250043009.
5
Prospective comparison of open vs. laparoscopic colon surgery for carcinoma. Five-year results.开放性与腹腔镜结肠癌手术的前瞻性比较。五年结果。
Dis Colon Rectum. 1996 Oct;39(10 Suppl):S35-46. doi: 10.1007/BF02053804.
6
Laparoscopic resection for diverticular disease.腹腔镜下憩室病切除术
Dis Colon Rectum. 1996 Oct;39(10 Suppl):S1-6. doi: 10.1007/BF02053798.
7
Laparoscopic anterior resection: a consecutive series of 84 patients.
Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1996 Jun;6(3):213-7.
8
Laparoscopic colectomy vs traditional colectomy for diverticulitis. Outcome and costs.腹腔镜结肠切除术与传统结肠切除术治疗憩室炎的疗效及成本比较
Surg Endosc. 1996 Jan;10(1):15-8. doi: 10.1007/s004649910002.
9
Laparoscopic-assisted colorectal surgery. Lessons learned from 240 consecutive patients.腹腔镜辅助结直肠手术。从连续240例患者中吸取的经验教训。
Dis Colon Rectum. 1996 Feb;39(2):155-9. doi: 10.1007/BF02068069.
10
Randomized controlled trials in surgery: Issues and problems.
Surgery. 1996 May;119(5):483-6. doi: 10.1016/s0039-6060(96)80254-6.

腹腔镜辅助下前切除术治疗憩室病:100例连续患者的随访

Laparoscopically assisted anterior resection for diverticular disease: follow-up of 100 consecutive patients.

作者信息

Stevenson A R, Stitz R W, Lumley J W, Fielding G A

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Royal Brisbane Hospital, Australia.

出版信息

Ann Surg. 1998 Mar;227(3):335-42. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199803000-00004.

DOI:10.1097/00000658-199803000-00004
PMID:9527055
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1191270/
Abstract

PURPOSE

The objectives of this study were to refine the technique of laparoscopically assisted anterior resection (LAR) for diverticular disease and to analyze the morbidity and mortality rates, and longer term follow-up of the first 100 consecutive patients.

METHODS

Data were collected prospectively, and follow-up was performed by an independent assessor using a standardized questionnaire.

RESULTS

The median duration of surgery was 180 minutes, the median time for passage of flatus was 2 days after surgery, and the median length of hospital stay was 4 days. Overall, the morbidity rate was 21%, and the wound infection rate was 5%. There were no deaths. Eight patients underwent open laparotomy. The rate of complications was significantly greater in the latter group of patients (75%) than in those who underwent laparoscopy (16%, p = 0.002). The comparison between the first 20 cases and the last 20 patients revealed a significantly shorter duration of surgery (median 225 min. vs. 150 min.; p < 0.0001) and decreased length of stay (6 days vs. 4 days, p < 0.0001). Apart from a nonsignificant increase in the length of surgery, there were no differences in other study parameters when comparisons were made between those patients who underwent LAR for complicated diverticular disease and those patients who underwent uncomplicated diverticular disease.

FOLLOW-UP: Ninety patients were available for follow-up at a median time of 37 months. Ninety-three percent of the patients reported that the surgery had improved their symptoms. No patient required hospitalization, and no one was treated with antibiotics for recurrent symptoms.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopically assisted anterior resection for diverticular disease has acceptable morbidity and mortality rates and a median postoperative hospital stay of only 4 days. Follow-up investigations revealed no recurrence of diverticulitis, and patients reported satisfaction regarding cosmetic and functional results.

摘要

目的

本研究的目的是完善腹腔镜辅助前切除术(LAR)治疗憩室病的技术,并分析前100例连续患者的发病率、死亡率及长期随访情况。

方法

前瞻性收集数据,由独立评估者使用标准化问卷进行随访。

结果

手术中位时长为180分钟,术后排气中位时间为2天,住院中位时长为4天。总体发病率为21%,伤口感染率为5%。无死亡病例。8例患者接受了开腹手术。后一组患者的并发症发生率(75%)显著高于接受腹腔镜手术的患者(16%,p = 0.002)。前20例与后20例患者的比较显示,手术时长显著缩短(中位时长分别为225分钟和150分钟;p < 0.0001),住院时长也有所减少(分别为6天和4天,p < 0.0001)。除手术时长无显著增加外,对因复杂性憩室病接受LAR手术的患者与因非复杂性憩室病接受手术的患者进行比较时,其他研究参数并无差异。

随访

90例患者可进行随访,中位随访时间为37个月。93%的患者报告手术改善了他们的症状。无患者需要住院治疗,也无人因症状复发接受抗生素治疗。

结论

腹腔镜辅助前切除术治疗憩室病的发病率和死亡率可接受,术后中位住院时长仅为4天。随访调查显示憩室炎无复发,患者对美容和功能效果表示满意。