Suppr超能文献

采用CZE 2000临床毛细管电泳系统进行血清蛋白电泳。

Serum protein electrophoresis by CZE 2000 clinical capillary electrophoresis system.

作者信息

Bossuyt X, Schiettekatte G, Bogaerts A, Blanckaert N

机构信息

Department of Clinical Pathology, University Hospital of Leuven, Belgium.

出版信息

Clin Chem. 1998 Apr;44(4):749-59.

PMID:9554485
Abstract

We compared the automated Paragon 2000 clinical capillary zone electrophoresis (CZE) system with two manual methods, agarose electrophoresis (AGE) and cellulose acetate electrophoresis (CAE). Reference intervals in healthy adults were determined for each method. When compared with AGE and CAE, CZE gave substantially higher reference values for the alpha1-globulin fraction. With CZE, within-run precision for fraction quantitation was between 0.5% (albumin) and 4.1% (alpha1-globulin). Total precision was between 0.8% (albumin) and 5.3% (beta-globulin). Data obtained from CZE showed poor linear correlation with results obtained by AGE but good linear correlation with data from CAE. Analysis of serum from patients with inter alia inflammation, nephrotic syndrome, or polyclonal gammopathy showed that clinical information obtained by CZE is comparable with information obtained by AGE and CAE. We conclude that CZE offers a clinically reliable alternative to AGE and CAE and has the advantages of automation, higher precision, and faster turnaround time.

摘要

我们将自动化的Paragon 2000临床毛细管区带电泳(CZE)系统与两种手工方法,即琼脂糖电泳(AGE)和醋酸纤维素电泳(CAE)进行了比较。确定了每种方法在健康成年人中的参考区间。与AGE和CAE相比,CZE得出的α1球蛋白组分参考值显著更高。使用CZE时,组分定量的批内精密度在0.5%(白蛋白)至4.1%(α1球蛋白)之间。总精密度在0.8%(白蛋白)至5.3%(β球蛋白)之间。从CZE获得的数据与AGE获得的结果线性相关性较差,但与CAE的数据线性相关性良好。对患有炎症、肾病综合征或多克隆丙种球蛋白病等疾病患者的血清分析表明,CZE获得的临床信息与AGE和CAE获得的信息相当。我们得出结论,CZE为AGE和CAE提供了一种临床可靠的替代方法,具有自动化、更高精密度和更快周转时间的优点。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验