Suppr超能文献

疾病基因中的错义突变:一种评估因果关系的贝叶斯方法。

Missense mutations in disease genes: a Bayesian approach to evaluate causality.

作者信息

Petersen G M, Parmigiani G, Thomas D

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.

出版信息

Am J Hum Genet. 1998 Jun;62(6):1516-24. doi: 10.1086/301871.

Abstract

The problem of interpreting missense mutations of disease-causing genes is an increasingly important one. Because these point mutations result in alteration of only a single amino acid of the protein product, it is often unclear whether this change alone is sufficient to cause disease. We propose a Bayesian approach that utilizes genetic information on affected relatives in families ascertained through known missense-mutation carriers. This method is useful in evaluating known disease genes for common disease phenotypes, such as breast cancer or colorectal cancer. The posterior probability that a missense mutation is disease causing is conditioned on the relationship of the relatives to the proband, the population frequency of the mutation, and the phenocopy rate of the disease. The approach is demonstrated in two cancer data sets: BRCA1 R841W and APC I1307K. In both examples, this method helps establish that these mutations are likely to be disease causing, with Bayes factors in favor of causality of 5.09 and 66.97, respectively, and posterior probabilities of .836 and .985. We also develop a simple approximation for rare alleles and consider the case of unknown penetrance and allele frequency.

摘要

解读致病基因错义突变的问题日益重要。由于这些点突变仅导致蛋白质产物的单个氨基酸发生改变,通常不清楚仅这一变化是否足以引发疾病。我们提出一种贝叶斯方法,该方法利用通过已知错义突变携带者确定的家系中患病亲属的遗传信息。此方法对于评估常见疾病表型(如乳腺癌或结直肠癌)的已知疾病基因很有用。错义突变导致疾病的后验概率取决于亲属与先证者的关系、突变的群体频率以及疾病的拟表型率。该方法在两个癌症数据集(BRCA1 R841W和APC I1307K)中得到了验证。在这两个例子中,该方法有助于确定这些突变可能导致疾病,支持因果关系的贝叶斯因子分别为5.09和66.97,后验概率分别为0.836和0.985。我们还针对稀有等位基因开发了一种简单近似方法,并考虑了外显率和等位基因频率未知的情况。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

7
Two-stage family-based designs for sequencing studies.用于测序研究的两阶段基于家系的设计。
BMC Proc. 2014 Jun 17;8(Suppl 1):S32. doi: 10.1186/1753-6561-8-S1-S32. eCollection 2014.

本文引用的文献

10
Pitfalls of genetic testing.基因检测的陷阱。
N Engl J Med. 1996 May 2;334(18):1192-4. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199605023341812.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验