Tanaka H, Iwai A, Oda J, Kuwagata Y, Matsuoka T, Shimazu T, Yoshioka T
The Department of Traumatology, Osaka University Medical School, Japan.
J Emerg Med. 1998 May-Jun;16(3):439-44. doi: 10.1016/s0736-4679(98)00014-6.
We investigated how patients were evacuated and transported from affected hospitals in the disaster area to backup hospitals following the 1995 catastrophic Hanshin-Awaji earthquake. A retrospective review was conducted of medical records of 6107 patients hospitalized during the first 15 days after the earthquake, collected from 48 affected hospitals in the disaster area and 47 backup hospitals in the surrounding area. Of the 6107 patients, a total of 2290 (38%) were transferred to backup hospitals, consisting of 187 patients (50%) with crush syndrome, 702 (26%) with other traumas, and 1401 (41%) with illness. Of those 2290 patients, 1741 (76%) were transferred from affected hospitals to backup hospitals, while 549 patients (24%) were evacuated directly to backup hospitals. The peak in transport came during the first 4 days. The family car was the most frequently used means of transport; ambulance was used in only 26% of cases, and helicopters were used minimally. There was no notable difference in the percentage of intensive care patients and nonintensive care patients transferred to backup hospitals. The mortality rate for patients with trauma and crush syndrome was significantly higher in the affected hospitals. These results suggest that the existing emergency medical service system was not adequate for this urban earthquake. From our vantage point, we are keenly aware of the need for improved communications between hospitals, a well equipped patient transport system, and a well coordinated disaster response mechanism.
我们调查了1995年阪神 - 淡路大地震后,受灾地区医院的患者是如何被疏散并转运至后备医院的。我们对震后前15天内住院的6107例患者的病历进行了回顾性研究,这些病历来自受灾地区的48家医院和周边地区的47家后备医院。在这6107例患者中,共有2290例(38%)被转运至后备医院,其中包括187例(50%)挤压综合征患者、702例(26%)其他创伤患者和1401例(41%)疾病患者。在这2290例患者中,1741例(76%)是从受灾医院转运至后备医院,而549例(24%)是直接疏散至后备医院。转运高峰出现在震后的前4天。私家车是最常用的运输方式;仅26%的情况使用了救护车,直升机的使用极少。转入后备医院的重症监护患者和非重症监护患者的比例没有显著差异。受灾医院中创伤和挤压综合征患者的死亡率显著更高。这些结果表明现有紧急医疗服务系统不足以应对此次城市地震。从我们的角度来看,我们强烈意识到需要改善医院之间的沟通、配备完善的患者转运系统以及协调良好的灾害应对机制。