Houtman I L, Goudswaard A, Dhondt S, van der Grinten M P, Hildebrandt V H, van der Poel E G
NIA TNO, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Occup Environ Med. 1998 Feb;55(2):73-83. doi: 10.1136/oem.55.2.73.
Due to recent changes in legislation on occupational health and safety, a national monitor on stress and physical load was developed in The Netherlands to monitor (a) risks and consequences of stress and physical load at work, (b) preventive actions in companies to reduce these risks, and (c) organisational and environmental variables that facilitate preventive actions.
Information was gathered from employers, employees, and employees' representatives. The monitor was used with a nationally representative sample of companies in industry, wholesale trade, and banking and finance, 782 companies in total.
The information from the employees, aggregated at the company level, was not found to be correlated with that from the employer from the same companies. Although many employers do recognise risk factors for both physical load and stress as a problem they often seem to underestimate the problem when compared with employees or their representatives. This is particularly the case for psychosocial risk factors. Also, the perception of outcome measures, especially employers who consider emotional exhaustion to be work related, were fewer than the employees' representatives of the same organisation. Preventive measures on physical load are much more popular than measures against stress. It is the responsibility of the employer to take more preventive action of all kinds. They need to recognise risk factors as problems and health outcomes to be related to work. Employees of larger companies should participate with employers to consider effective measures, and more use should be made of support at branch level. For specific preventive measures, specific predictors emerged. Except for measures to prevent work stress, information from employees did not sufficiently contribute to the initiation of preventive measures in the workplace.
由于近期职业健康与安全立法的变化,荷兰开发了一项关于压力和身体负荷的全国性监测,以监测:(a) 工作中压力和身体负荷的风险及后果;(b) 公司为降低这些风险采取的预防措施;(c) 促进预防措施的组织和环境变量。
从雇主、雇员和雇员代表处收集信息。该监测在工业、批发贸易以及银行和金融领域的全国代表性公司样本中使用,总共782家公司。
在公司层面汇总的员工信息与同公司雇主的信息未发现存在相关性。尽管许多雇主确实认识到身体负荷和压力的风险因素是问题,但与员工或其代表相比,他们似乎常常低估问题。心理社会风险因素尤其如此。此外,对结果指标的认知,特别是认为情感耗竭与工作相关的雇主,比同一组织的员工代表要少。针对身体负荷的预防措施比针对压力的措施更受欢迎。雇主有责任采取更多各类预防行动。他们需要将风险因素视为问题并将健康结果与工作联系起来。大公司的员工应与雇主共同参与考虑有效措施,并且应更多地利用行业层面的支持。对于特定的预防措施,出现了特定的预测因素。除了预防工作压力的措施外,员工提供的信息对工作场所预防措施的启动贡献不足。