Early E, Battle K, Cantwell E, English J, Lavin J E, Larson E
Shady Grove Adventist Hospital, Rockville, Md. 20850, USA.
Am J Infect Control. 1998 Jun;26(3):263-9. doi: 10.1016/s0196-6553(98)80011-4.
The purpose of this educational project was to assess the effect of several interventions on the frequency of handwashing among elementary public school children.
Participants in this project were first-graders and fourth-graders from jurisdictions within a mid-Atlantic metropolitan area. Phase I included a baseline assessment of bathroom cleanliness as well as adequacy of supplies for handwashing in each school. During phase 2, the frequency of handwashing before lunch or after bathroom use was monitored and recorded during a 2-month period. The schools were separated into four groups: a peer education group, a hand wipes and instructional poster group, a combination of the education and hand wipes/poster groups, and a (control) comparison school.
Overall, a significant increase occurred in the proportion of handwashing frequency from preintervention to postintervention for each intervention group (wipes: 0.50 vs 0.66, p = 0.03; education only: 0.64 vs 0.72, p = 0.02; and education and wipes: 0.45 vs 0.67, p = 0.03) but not in the control group (0.42 vs 0.46, p = 0.26). When the first 3 weeks and the last 3 weeks after intervention were compared, handwashing frequency remained unchanged in the wipes only group (0.66 vs 0.66, p = 0.96), decreased in the education group (0.77 vs 0.65, p = 0.006), and increased in the education and wipes group (0.58 vs 0.75, p = 0.003), as well as in the control group (0.37 vs 0.52, p = 0.01).
Education combined with accessible convenient hand hygiene may result in a sustainable increase in the frequency of handwashing among elementary school children.
本教育项目的目的是评估几种干预措施对公立小学儿童洗手频率的影响。
本项目的参与者是来自大西洋中部大都市地区各辖区的一年级和四年级学生。第一阶段包括对每所学校卫生间清洁度以及洗手用品充足情况的基线评估。在第二阶段,在为期2个月的时间里监测并记录学生午餐前或使用卫生间后洗手的频率。学校被分为四组:同伴教育组、湿纸巾和教学海报组、教育与湿纸巾/海报组合组以及(对照)比较学校。
总体而言,各干预组从干预前到干预后洗手频率的比例均显著增加(湿纸巾组:0.50对0.66,p = 0.03;仅教育组:0.64对0.72,p = 0.02;教育与湿纸巾组:0.45对0.67,p = 0.03),但对照组未增加(0.42对0.46,p = 0.26)。比较干预后的前3周和最后3周,仅使用湿纸巾组的洗手频率保持不变(0.66对0.66,p = 0.96),教育组下降(0.77对0.65,p = 0.006),教育与湿纸巾组增加(0.58对0.75,p = 0.003),对照组也增加(0.37对0.52,p = 0.01)。
教育与方便易用的手部卫生措施相结合可能会使小学儿童的洗手频率持续增加。