Stålbrand H, Mansfield S D, Saddler J N, Kilburn D G, Warren R A, Gilkes N R
Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1998 Jul;64(7):2374-9. doi: 10.1128/AEM.64.7.2374-2379.1998.
Four beta-1,4-glucanases (cellulases) of the cellulolytic bacterium Cellulomonas fimi were purified from Escherichia coli cells transformed with recombinant plasmids. Previous analyses using soluble substrates had suggested that CenA and CenC were endoglucanases while CbhA and CbhB resembled the exo-acting cellobiohydrolases produced by cellulolytic fungi. Analysis of molecular size distributions during cellulose hydrolysis by the individual enzymes confirmed these preliminary findings and provided further evidence that endoglucanase CenC has a more processive hydrolytic activity than CenA. The significant differences between the size distributions obtained during hydrolysis of bacterial microcrystalline cellulose and acid-swollen cellulose can be explained in terms of the accessibility of beta-1,4-glucan chains to enzyme attack. Endoglucanases and cellobiohydrolases were much more easily distinguished when the acid-swollen substrate was used.
从用重组质粒转化的大肠杆菌细胞中纯化出了纤维分解菌纤维单胞菌的四种β-1,4-葡聚糖酶(纤维素酶)。之前使用可溶性底物的分析表明,CenA和CenC是内切葡聚糖酶,而CbhA和CbhB类似于纤维素分解真菌产生的外切纤维二糖水解酶。对各酶在纤维素水解过程中的分子大小分布进行分析,证实了这些初步发现,并进一步证明内切葡聚糖酶CenC比CenA具有更强的持续水解活性。细菌微晶纤维素和酸膨胀纤维素水解过程中获得的大小分布之间的显著差异,可以根据β-1,4-葡聚糖链对酶攻击的可及性来解释。当使用酸膨胀底物时,内切葡聚糖酶和纤维二糖水解酶更容易区分。