• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

群体思维理论与研究的二十五年：理论评估的启示

Twenty-Five Years of Groupthink Theory and Research: Lessons from the Evaluation of a Theory.

作者信息

Turner ME, Pratkanis AR

机构信息

San Jose State University

出版信息

Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1998 Feb;73(2/3):105-15. doi: 10.1006/obhd.1998.2756.

DOI:10.1006/obhd.1998.2756
PMID:9705798
Abstract

In this paper, we examine the historical development of the groupthink model and discuss recent responses to the body of empirical evidence amassed on the model. We conclude by articulating general lessons implied by the evolution of research on the groupthink model. Copyright 1998 Academic Press.

摘要

在本文中，我们考察了群体思维模型的历史发展，并讨论了近期针对该模型所积累的大量实证证据的回应。我们通过阐述群体思维模型研究演变所蕴含的一般经验教训来得出结论。版权所有1998年学术出版社。

相似文献

1
Twenty-Five Years of Groupthink Theory and Research: Lessons from the Evaluation of a Theory.群体思维理论与研究的二十五年：理论评估的启示
Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1998 Feb;73(2/3):105-15. doi: 10.1006/obhd.1998.2756.
2
Alive and Well after 25 Years: A Review of Groupthink Research.25年后依然活跃且发展良好：群体思维研究综述
Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1998 Feb;73(2/3):116-41. doi: 10.1006/obhd.1998.2758.
3
Organizational Tonypandy: Lessons from a Quarter Century of the Groupthink Phenomenon.组织性托宁潘迪现象：从群体思维现象的二十五年中汲取的教训
Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1998 Feb;73(2/3):163-84. doi: 10.1006/obhd.1998.2760.
4
Group Dynamics in Janis's Theory of Groupthink: Backward and Forward.詹尼斯群体思维理论中的群体动力学：回顾与展望。
Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1998 Feb;73(2/3):142-62. doi: 10.1006/obhd.1998.2759.
5
A Social Identity Maintenance Model of Groupthink.群体思维的社会身份维持模型。
Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1998 Feb;73(2/3):210-35. doi: 10.1006/obhd.1998.2757.
6
The Tendency toward Defective Decision Making within Self-Managing Teams: The Relevance of Groupthink for the 21st Century.自我管理团队中决策失误的倾向：群体思维在21世纪的相关性。
Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1998 Feb;73(2/3):327-51. doi: 10.1006/obhd.1998.2765.
7
Recasting Janis's Groupthink Model: The Key Role of Collective Efficacy in Decision Fiascoes.重塑贾尼斯的群体思维模型：集体效能在决策失败中的关键作用。
Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1998 Feb;73(2/3):185-209. doi: 10.1006/obhd.1998.2761.
8
Developing Consensus about Groupthink after All These Years.多年之后对群体思维达成共识。
Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1998 Feb;73(2/3):362-74. doi: 10.1006/obhd.1998.2767.
9
Group Dynamics in Top Management Teams: Groupthink, Vigilance, and Alternative Models of Organizational Failure and Success.高层管理团队中的群体动态：群体思维、警觉以及组织成败的其他模型
Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1998 Feb;73(2/3):272-305. doi: 10.1006/obhd.1998.2763.
10
Groupthink, Bay of Pigs, and Watergate Reconsidered.对群体思维、猪湾事件和水门事件的重新审视
Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1998 Feb;73(2/3):352-61. doi: 10.1006/obhd.1998.2766.

引用本文的文献

1
A cross-cultural EEG study of how obedience and conformity influence reconciliation intentions.一项关于服从和从众如何影响和解意愿的跨文化脑电图研究。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2025 May 22;20(1). doi: 10.1093/scan/nsaf038.
2
Mitigating the Nocebo Effect in Biosimilar Use and Switching: A Systematic Review.减轻生物类似药使用和换药中的反安慰剂效应：一项系统评价
Pharmaceut Med. 2024 Nov;38(6):429-455. doi: 10.1007/s40290-024-00541-y. Epub 2024 Nov 29.
3
Assessing Severity and Need for Delivery in Early Onset Preeclampsia Before 32 Weeks of Gestation: a Delphi Consensus Procedure.
评估孕32周前早发型子痫前期的严重程度及分娩需求：德尔菲共识程序
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2024 Aug 6;84(8):760-772. doi: 10.1055/a-2361-0563. eCollection 2024 Aug.
4
Unraveling complexity in changing mental health care towards person-centered care.在向以患者为中心的护理转变的过程中揭示心理健康护理的复杂性。
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Sep 14;14:1250856. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1250856. eCollection 2023.
5
The Effects of Rudeness on NICU Medical Teams Studied by a New Tool for the Assessment of Decision-Making Group Dynamics.一种用于评估决策小组动态的新工具对新生儿重症监护室医疗团队粗鲁行为影响的研究
Children (Basel). 2022 Sep 21;9(10):1436. doi: 10.3390/children9101436.
6
Between Sympathy, Fascination, and Powerlessness. The Experiences of Health Professionals During the Medical Monitoring of a Hunger Strike Among Undocumented Migrants.在同情、着迷和无能为力之间。卫生专业人员在对无证移民绝食进行医疗监测期间的经历。
Front Public Health. 2022 May 25;10:756964. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.756964. eCollection 2022.
7
How to Make Health and Risk Communication on Social Media More "Social" During COVID-19.如何在新冠疫情期间让社交媒体上的健康与风险沟通更具“社交性” 。
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2021 Aug 25;14:3523-3540. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S317517. eCollection 2021.
8
Accreditation and Certification: Do They Improve Hospital Financial and Quality Performance?认证与认可：它们能提升医院的财务和质量绩效吗？
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Jul 14;9(7):887. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9070887.
9
Conceptualising interventions to enhance spread in complex systems: a multisite comprehensive medication review case study.概念化干预措施以增强复杂系统中的传播：多地点综合药物审查案例研究。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2022 Jan;31(1):31-44. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2020-012367. Epub 2021 May 14.
10
A Guide to Establishing Ethics Committees in Behavioral Health Settings.行为健康环境中伦理委员会设立指南。
Behav Anal Pract. 2020 Aug 17;13(4):939-949. doi: 10.1007/s40617-020-00455-6. eCollection 2020 Dec.