Wells A J, English P B, Posner S F, Wagenknecht L E, Perez-Stable E J
Impact Assessment, Inc, California Department of Health Services, Environmental Health Investigations Branch, Emeryville, USA.
Am J Public Health. 1998 Oct;88(10):1503-9. doi: 10.2105/ajph.88.10.1503.
This paper provides misclassification rates for current cigarette smokers who report themselves as nonsmokers. Such rates are important in determining smoker misclassification bias in the estimation of relative risks in passive smoking studies.
True smoking status, either occasional or regular, was determined for individual current smokers in 3 existing studies of nonsmokers by inspecting the cotinine levels of body fluids. The new data, combined with an approximately equal amount in the 1992 Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) report on passive smoking and lung cancer, yielded misclassification rates that not only had lower standard errors but also were stratified by sex and US minority majority status.
The misclassification rates for the important category of female smokers misclassified as never smokers were, respectively, 0.8%, 6.0%, 2.8%, and 15.3% for majority regular, majority occasional, US minority regular, and US minority occasional smokers. Misclassification rates for males were mostly somewhat higher.
The new information supports EPA's conclusion that smoker misclassification bias is small. Also, investigators are advised to pay attention to minority/majority status of cohorts when correcting for smoker misclassification bias.
本文提供了自认为不吸烟的当前吸烟者的错误分类率。这些比率对于在被动吸烟研究中估计相对风险时确定吸烟者错误分类偏差很重要。
通过检测3项现有非吸烟者研究中个体当前吸烟者的可替宁水平,确定其真实吸烟状态,即偶尔吸烟或经常吸烟。新数据与1992年环境保护局(EPA)关于被动吸烟与肺癌的报告中大致等量的数据相结合,得出的错误分类率不仅标准误差更低,而且按性别和美国少数族裔/多数族裔身份进行了分层。
被误分类为从不吸烟的重要女性吸烟者类别中,多数经常吸烟者、多数偶尔吸烟者、美国少数族裔经常吸烟者和美国少数族裔偶尔吸烟者的错误分类率分别为0.8%、6.0%、2.8%和15.3%。男性的错误分类率大多略高。
新信息支持EPA的结论,即吸烟者错误分类偏差较小。此外,建议研究人员在纠正吸烟者错误分类偏差时注意队列的少数族裔/多数族裔身份。