Agran P F, Winn D G, Anderson C L, Del Valle C
Department of Pediatrics and Health Policy and Research, University of California Irvine 92697-5800, USA.
Inj Prev. 1998 Sep;4(3):188-93. doi: 10.1136/ip.4.3.188.
In an earlier population based surveillance study of pediatric injuries, the rate of Hispanic children injured as pedestrians was 63/100,000 compared with 17/100,000 for non-Hispanic white children. The present study was designed to examine the effect of family, social, and cultural factors on the rate of pedestrian injury in a population of Hispanic children in the southwestern US.
A case-control study of pedestrian injuries among Hispanic children. The sample consisted of 98 children 0-14 years of age hospitalized as a result of a pedestrian injury and 144 randomly selected neighborhood controls matched to the case by city, age, gender, and ethnicity. Cases were compared with controls using conditional logistic regression; in the study design the odds ratio (OR) estimates the incidence rate ratio.
The following family and cultural variables were associated with an increased risk of injury: household crowding (OR = 2.8, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.1 to 7.1 for 1.01-1.5 persons per room, compared with < or = 1.0 persons per room), one or more family moves within the past year (OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.2 to 4.1), poverty (OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.1 to 3.3), and inability of mother (OR 3.6, 95% CI 1.3 to 10) or father (OR 5.6, 95% CI 1.5 to 20) to read well. However, children in single parent households and children whose parents did not drive a car, had less education, or were of rural origin, did not have an increased rate of injury.
These results have implications for childhood pedestrian prevention efforts for low income, non-English speaking Hispanic populations, and perhaps for other immigrant and high risk groups. Prevention programs and materials need to be not only culturally sensitive but also designed for those with limited reading skills. In addition, environmental interventions that provide more pedestrian friendly neighborhoods must be considered.
在一项早期基于人群的儿童伤害监测研究中,西班牙裔儿童行人受伤率为63/100,000,而非西班牙裔白人儿童为17/100,000。本研究旨在调查家庭、社会和文化因素对美国西南部西班牙裔儿童人群中行人受伤率的影响。
对西班牙裔儿童行人受伤情况进行病例对照研究。样本包括98名0至14岁因行人受伤而住院的儿童,以及144名按城市、年龄、性别和种族与病例匹配的随机选择的社区对照。使用条件逻辑回归将病例与对照进行比较;在研究设计中,比值比(OR)估计发病率比。
以下家庭和文化变量与受伤风险增加相关:家庭拥挤(每间房1.01至1.5人时,OR = 2.8,95%置信区间(CI)为1.1至7.1,而每间房≤1.0人时)、过去一年内家庭有一次或多次搬迁(OR 2.2,95%CI 1.2至4.1)、贫困(OR 1.9,95%CI 1.1至3.3)以及母亲(OR 3.6,95%CI 1.3至10)或父亲(OR 5.6,95%CI 1.5至20)阅读能力差。然而,单亲家庭中的儿童以及父母不开车、教育程度较低或来自农村的儿童,受伤率并未增加。
这些结果对低收入、非英语的西班牙裔人群以及可能对其他移民和高危群体的儿童行人预防工作具有启示意义。预防项目和材料不仅需要具有文化敏感性,还需要为阅读能力有限的人群设计。此外,必须考虑提供更适合行人的社区环境干预措施。