Ware J E, Gandek B
Health Assessment Lab at the Health Institute, New England Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts 02111, USA.
J Clin Epidemiol. 1998 Nov;51(11):945-52. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(98)00085-7.
Following the translation development stage, the second research stage of the IQOLA Project tests the assumptions underlying item scoring and scale construction. This article provides detailed information on the research methods used by the IQOLA Project to evaluate data quality, scaling and scoring assumptions, and the reliability of the SF-36 scales. Tests include evaluation of item and scale-level descriptive statistics; examination of the equality of item-scale correlations, item internal consistency and item discriminant validity; and estimation of scale score reliability using internal consistency and test-retest methods. Results from these tests are used to determine if standard algorithms for the construction and scoring of the eight SF-36 scales can be used in each country and to provide information that can be used in translation improvement.
在翻译发展阶段之后,IQOLA项目的第二个研究阶段检验了项目评分和量表构建所依据的假设。本文详细介绍了IQOLA项目用于评估数据质量、量表和评分假设以及SF-36量表可靠性的研究方法。测试包括对项目和量表层面描述性统计的评估;对项目-量表相关性、项目内部一致性和项目区分效度的平等性检验;以及使用内部一致性和重测法对量表得分可靠性的估计。这些测试的结果用于确定八个SF-36量表的构建和评分标准算法是否可在每个国家使用,并提供可用于改进翻译的信息。