Amanzio M, Benedetti F
Department of Neuroscience and Centro Interuniversitario per la Neurofisio logia del Dolore Center for the Neurophysiology of Pain, University of Torino Medical School, 10125 Torino, Italy.
J Neurosci. 1999 Jan 1;19(1):484-94. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-01-00484.1999.
We investigated the mechanisms underlying the activation of endogenous opioids in placebo analgesia by using the model of human experimental ischemic arm pain. Different types of placebo analgesic responses were evoked by means of cognitive expectation cues, drug conditioning, or a combination of both. Drug conditioning was performed by means of either the opioid agonist morphine hydrochloride or the nonopioid ketorolac tromethamine. Expectation cues produced placebo responses that were completely blocked by the opioid antagonist naloxone. Expectation cues together with morphine conditioning produced placebo responses that were completely antagonized by naloxone. Morphine conditioning alone (without expectation cues) induced a naloxone-reversible placebo effect. By contrast, ketorolac conditioning together with expectation cues elicited a placebo effect that was blocked by naloxone only partially. Ketorolac conditioning alone produced placebo responses that were naloxone-insensitive. Therefore, we evoked different types of placebo responses that were either naloxone-reversible or partially naloxone-reversible or, otherwise, naloxone-insensitive, depending on the procedure used to evoke the placebo response. These findings show that cognitive factors and conditioning are balanced in different ways in placebo analgesia, and this balance is crucial for the activation of opioid or nonopioid systems. Expectation triggers endogenous opioids, whereas conditioning activates specific subsystems. In fact, if conditioning is performed with opioids, placebo analgesia is mediated via opioid receptors, if conditioning is performed with nonopioid drugs, other nonopioid mechanisms result to be involved.
我们采用人体实验性缺血性手臂疼痛模型,研究了安慰剂镇痛中内源性阿片类物质激活的潜在机制。通过认知预期线索、药物条件作用或两者结合的方式,诱发了不同类型的安慰剂镇痛反应。药物条件作用通过阿片类激动剂盐酸吗啡或非阿片类药物酮咯酸氨丁三醇来进行。预期线索产生的安慰剂反应被阿片类拮抗剂纳洛酮完全阻断。预期线索与吗啡条件作用共同产生的安慰剂反应被纳洛酮完全拮抗。单独的吗啡条件作用(无预期线索)诱导出一种可被纳洛酮逆转的安慰剂效应。相比之下,酮咯酸条件作用与预期线索共同引发的安慰剂效应仅被纳洛酮部分阻断。单独的酮咯酸条件作用产生的安慰剂反应对纳洛酮不敏感。因此,根据诱发安慰剂反应所采用的程序,我们诱发了不同类型的安慰剂反应,这些反应要么可被纳洛酮逆转,要么部分可被纳洛酮逆转,要么对纳洛酮不敏感。这些发现表明,在安慰剂镇痛中,认知因素和条件作用以不同方式达到平衡,这种平衡对于阿片类或非阿片类系统的激活至关重要。预期触发内源性阿片类物质,而条件作用激活特定的子系统。事实上,如果用阿片类药物进行条件作用,安慰剂镇痛是通过阿片受体介导的;如果用非阿片类药物进行条件作用,则涉及其他非阿片类机制。